Kim Byungsu, Wang Hee Ryung, Son Jung In, Kim Chang Yoon, Joo Yeon Ho
Department of Psychiatry, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Pungnap-dong, Seoul 138-736, South Korea.
Compr Psychiatry. 2008 Sep-Oct;49(5):469-75. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
The present study was performed to evaluate the frequency of bipolar disorders among patients (a) presenting with depressive episodes but (b) who have never been diagnosed with bipolar disorder (c) in routine clinical practice in Korean subjects and to identify which clinical features were helpful in discriminating bipolar patients from unipolar patients. In addition, authors assessed the practical use of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) to distinguish bipolar from unipolar disorder in these subjects and tested whether modifications of the MDQ scoring could improve its performance.
We evaluated consecutive patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria of a current depressive episode, plus at least one previous depressive episode. Subjects were interviewed for diagnosis using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV after completing the MDQ. To improve assessment of hypomania history, the interviewer made strenuous efforts to explore a possible history of hypomania, and patient-derived data were supplemented by information from family members or close relatives.
Fifty-nine patients (53.2%) were classified as having bipolar disorder, leaving a group of 52 (46.8%) with unipolar depression. Among bipolar disorders, 1.8% (n = 2) had bipolar I disorder; 29.7% (n = 33), bipolar II disorder; 6.3% (n = 7), bipolar III disorder (history of antidepressant-induced hypomania without spontaneous hypomanic episode); and 15.3% (n = 17), bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (1-3 days brief hypomania). Postpartum depression (relative risk [RR] [95% confidence interval {CI}], 2.00 [1.23-3.24]), early age of onset (RR [95% CI], 1.85 [1.30-2.64]), mood lability (RR [95% CI], 1.85 [1.30-2.64]), brief depressive episode (RR [95% CI], 1.66 (1.16-2.37]), bipolar family history (RR [95% CI], 1.62 [1.08-2.43]), history of suicide attempt (RR [95% CI], 1.47 (1.05-2.04]), and alcohol problem (RR [95% CI], 1.45 (1.04-2.02]) were found to have higher risks for bipolar disorder among depressive subjects. We found that a modified scoring of the MDQ (ignoring question on functional impairment and co-occurrence of symptoms) yielded a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.63 for bipolar diagnosis, whereas the figures were 0.29 and 0.77, respectively, with the standard MDQ scoring.
The results of this study clearly indicate that a high frequency of bipolar disorders in depressive patients who have never been diagnosed with bipolar disorders and clinical features indicating bipolarity could help to differentiate bipolar subjects from unipolar subjects. Adapting the standard scoring, the MDQ showed limited use for detecting bipolar disorder; however, if the scoring modification is adapted, the MDQ can offer tolerable sensitivity.
本研究旨在评估韩国受试者在常规临床实践中,(a)出现抑郁发作但(b)从未被诊断为双相情感障碍的患者中双相情感障碍的发生率,并确定哪些临床特征有助于区分双相情感障碍患者和单相情感障碍患者。此外,作者评估了心境障碍问卷(MDQ)在区分这些受试者的双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍方面的实际应用,并测试了MDQ评分的修改是否能提高其性能。
我们评估了符合当前抑郁发作纳入标准且至少有一次既往抑郁发作的连续患者。在完成MDQ后,使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版的结构化临床访谈对受试者进行诊断访谈。为了改善对轻躁狂病史的评估,访谈者竭尽全力探索可能的轻躁狂病史,并通过家庭成员或近亲提供的信息补充患者提供的数据。
59名患者(53.2%)被归类为双相情感障碍,其余52名(46.8%)为单相抑郁症患者。在双相情感障碍患者中,1.8%(n = 2)为双相I型障碍;29.7%(n = 33)为双相II型障碍;6.3%(n = 7)为双相III型障碍(抗抑郁药诱发轻躁狂病史但无自发轻躁狂发作);15.3%(n = 17)为未特定的双相情感障碍(1 - 3天短暂轻躁狂)。产后抑郁(相对危险度[RR][95%置信区间{CI}],2.00[1.23 - 3.24])、发病年龄早(RR[95% CI],1.85[1.30 - 2.64])、情绪不稳定(RR[95% CI],1.85[1.30 - 2.64])、短暂抑郁发作(RR[95% CI],1.66[1.16 - 2.37])、双相情感障碍家族史(RR[95% CI],1.62[1.08 - 2.43])、自杀未遂史(RR[95% CI],1.47[1.05 - 2.04])和酒精问题(RR[95% CI],1.45[1.04 - 2.02])在抑郁受试者中被发现患双相情感障碍的风险更高。我们发现,对MDQ进行修改评分(忽略关于功能损害和症状共现的问题)对双相情感障碍诊断的敏感性为0.68,特异性为0.63,而标准MDQ评分的敏感性和特异性分别为0.29和0.77。
本研究结果清楚地表明,在从未被诊断为双相情感障碍的抑郁患者中双相情感障碍的高发生率以及表明双相性的临床特征有助于区分双相情感障碍患者和单相情感障碍患者。采用标准评分时,MDQ在检测双相情感障碍方面用途有限;然而,如果采用修改后的评分,MDQ可以提供可接受的敏感性。