Suppr超能文献

评估中心维度有效性的进一步证据:维度评分增量标准关联效度的元分析

Further evidence for the validity of assessment center dimensions: a meta-analysis of the incremental criterion-related validity of dimension ratings.

作者信息

Meriac John P, Hoffman Brian J, Woehr David J, Fleisher Matthew S

机构信息

Department of Management, University of Tennessee, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2008 Sep;93(5):1042-52. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1042.

Abstract

This study investigates the incremental variance in job performance explained by assessment center (AC) dimensions over and above personality and cognitive ability. The authors extend previous research by using meta-analysis to examine the relationships between AC dimensions, personality, cognitive ability, and job performance. The results indicate that the 7 summary AC dimensions postulated by W. Arthur, Jr., E. A. Day, T. L. McNelly, & P. S. Edens (2003) are distinguishable from popular individual difference constructs and explain a sizeable proportion of variance in job performance beyond cognitive ability and personality.

摘要

本研究调查了评估中心(AC)维度相对于人格和认知能力所解释的工作绩效增量方差。作者通过元分析扩展了先前的研究,以检验AC维度、人格、认知能力和工作绩效之间的关系。结果表明,小W. 亚瑟、E. A. 戴、T. L. 麦克内利和P. S. 伊登斯(2003年)假设的7个AC总体维度与常见的个体差异结构不同,并且在认知能力和人格之外解释了相当大比例的工作绩效方差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验