Khwannimit Bodin
Division of Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Sep;91(9):1336-42.
To perform a serial assessment and compare ability in predicting the intensive care unit (ICU) mortality of the multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and logistic organ dysfunction (LOD) score.
The data were collected prospectively on consecutive ICU admissions over a 24-month period at a tertiary referral university hospital. The MODS, SOFA, and LOD scores were calculated on initial and repeated every 24 hrs.
Two thousand fifty four patients were enrolled in the present study. The maximum and delta-scores of all the organ dysfunction scores correlated with ICU mortality. The maximum score of all models had better ability for predicting ICU mortality than initial or delta score. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for maximum scores was 0.892 for the MODS, 0.907 for the SOFA, and 0.92for the LOD. No statistical difference existed between all maximum scores and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score.
Serial assessment of organ dysfunction during the ICU stay is reliable with ICU mortality. The maximum scores is the best discrimination comparable with APACHE II score in predicting ICU mortality.
对多器官功能障碍评分(MODS)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和逻辑器官功能障碍(LOD)评分预测重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率的能力进行系列评估并比较。
前瞻性收集一所三级转诊大学医院24个月期间连续入住ICU患者的数据。在初始时计算MODS、SOFA和LOD评分,并每24小时重复计算一次。
本研究纳入了254例患者。所有器官功能障碍评分的最高值和差值与ICU死亡率相关。所有模型的最高评分在预测ICU死亡率方面比初始评分或差值评分具有更好的能力。MODS最高评分的受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积为0.892,SOFA为0.907,LOD为0.92。所有最高评分与急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II(APACHE II)评分之间无统计学差异。
在ICU住院期间对器官功能障碍进行系列评估与ICU死亡率相关。在预测ICU死亡率方面,最高评分与APACHE II评分具有最佳的鉴别能力。