Barnett Mitchell J, Frank Jessica, Wehring Heidi, Newland Brand, VonMuenster Shannon, Kumbera Patty, Halterman Tom, Perry Paul J
Touro University-California, College of Pharmacy, 1310 Johnson Ave, Vallejo, CA 94592, USA.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):18-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.1.18.
Although community pharmacists have historically been paid primarily for drug distribution and dispensing services, medication therapy management (MTM) services evolved in the 1990s as a means for pharmacists and other providers to assist physicians and patients in managing clinical, service, and cost outcomes of drug therapy. The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA 2003) and the subsequent implementation of Medicare Part D in January 2006 for the more than 20 million Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in the Part D benefit formalized MTM services for a subset of high-cost patients. Although Medicare Part D has provided a new opportunity for defining the value of pharmacist-provided MTM services in the health care system, few publications exist which quantify changes in the provision of pharmacist-provided MTM services over time.
To (a) describe the changes over a 7-year period in the primary types of MTM services provided by community pharmacies that have contracted with drug plan sponsors through an MTM administrative services company, and (b) quantify potential MTM-related cost savings based on pharmacists' self-assessments of the likely effects of their interventions on health care utilization.
Medication therapy management claims from a multistate MTM administrative services company were analyzed over the 7-year period from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006. Data extracted from each MTM claim included patient demographics (e.g., age and gender), the drug and type that triggered the intervention (e.g., drug therapeutic class and therapy type as either acute, intermittent, or chronic), and specific information about the service provided (e.g., Reason, Action, Result, and Estimated Cost Avoidance [ECA]). ECA values are derived from average national health care utilization costs, which are applied to pharmacist self-assessment of the "reasonable and foreseeable" outcome of the intervention. ECA values are updated annually for medical care inflation.
From a database of nearly 100,000 MTM claims, a convenience sample of 50 plan sponsors was selected. After exclusion of claims with missing or potentially duplicate data, there were 76,148 claims for 23,798 patients from community pharmacy MTM providers in 47 states. Over the 7-year period from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006, the mean ([SD] median) pharmacy reimbursement was $8.44 ([$5.19] $7.00) per MTM service, and the mean ([SD] median) ECA was $93.78 ([$1,022.23] $5.00). During the 7-year period, pharmacist provided MTM interventions changed from primarily education and monitoring for new or changed prescription therapies to prescriber consultations regarding cost-efficacy management (Pearson chi-square P<0.001). Services also shifted from claims involving acute medications (e.g. penicillin antibiotics, macrolide antibiotics, and narcotic analgesics) to services involving chronic medications (e.g., lipid lowering agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, and beta-blockers; P<0.001), resulting in significant changes in the therapeutic classes associated with MTM claims and an increase in the proportion of older patients served (P<0.001). These trends resulted in higher pharmacy reimbursements and greater ECA per claim over time (P<0.001).
MTM interventions over a 7-year period evolved from primarily the provision of patient education involving acute medications towards consultation-type services for chronic medications. These changes were associated with increases in reimbursement amounts and pharmacist-estimated cost savings. It is uncertain if this shift in service type is a result of clinical need, documentation requirements, or reimbursement opportunities.
尽管社区药剂师历来主要因药品分发和配药服务而获得报酬,但药物治疗管理(MTM)服务在20世纪90年代得到发展,成为药剂师和其他医疗服务提供者协助医生和患者管理药物治疗的临床、服务和成本结果的一种方式。2003年的《医疗保险处方药、改进和现代化法案》(2003年MMA)以及随后于2006年1月为超过2000万参加D部分福利的医疗保险受益人实施的医疗保险D部分,使针对一部分高成本患者的MTM服务正式化。尽管医疗保险D部分为在医疗保健系统中界定药剂师提供的MTM服务的价值提供了新机会,但很少有出版物对药剂师提供的MTM服务随时间的变化情况进行量化。
(a)描述通过MTM行政服务公司与药品计划赞助商签约的社区药房提供的MTM服务主要类型在7年期间的变化,以及(b)根据药剂师对其干预措施对医疗保健利用可能产生的影响的自我评估,量化与MTM相关的潜在成本节约。
对一家多州MTM行政服务公司在2000年1月1日至2006年12月31日这7年期间的药物治疗管理索赔进行了分析。从每份MTM索赔中提取的数据包括患者人口统计学信息(如年龄和性别)、引发干预的药物和类型(如药物治疗类别以及治疗类型是急性、间歇性还是慢性),以及所提供服务的具体信息(如原因、行动、结果和估计成本避免[ECA])。ECA值来自全国平均医疗保健利用成本,并应用于药剂师对干预措施“合理且可预见”结果的自我评估。ECA值每年根据医疗保健通胀情况进行更新。
从近10万份MTM索赔的数据库中,选取了50个计划赞助商的便利样本。在排除数据缺失或可能重复的索赔后,来自47个州社区药房MTM提供者的23798名患者有76148份索赔。在2000年1月1日至2006年12月31日的7年期间,每项MTM服务的药房平均([标准差]中位数)报销金额为8.44美元([5.19美元]7.00美元),平均([标准差]中位数)ECA为93.78美元([1022.23美元]5.00美元)。在这7年期间,药剂师提供的MTM干预措施从主要针对新的或变更的处方治疗进行教育和监测,转变为就成本效益管理与开处方者进行咨询(Pearson卡方检验P<0.001)。服务也从涉及急性药物(如青霉素类抗生素、大环内酯类抗生素和麻醉性镇痛药)的索赔,转向涉及慢性药物(如降脂药、血管紧张素转换酶[ACE]抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂;P<0.001)的服务,导致与MTM索赔相关的治疗类别发生显著变化,且服务的老年患者比例增加(P<0.001)。这些趋势导致随着时间推移药房报销金额增加,每项索赔的ECA更高(P<0.001)。
7年期间的MTM干预措施从主要提供涉及急性药物的患者教育,演变为针对慢性药物的咨询类服务。这些变化与报销金额增加和药剂师估计的成本节约相关。服务类型的这种转变是否是临床需求、文件要求或报销机会的结果尚不确定。