Trivedi Madhukar H, Thase Michael E, Fava Maurizio, Nelson Craig J, Yang Huyuan, Qi Ying, Tran Quynh-Van, Pikalov Andrei, Carlson Berit X, Marcus Ronald N, Berman Robert M
UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9119, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;69(12):1928-36. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
To evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive aripiprazole to standard antidepressant therapy (ADT) for patients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder with anxious/atypical features at baseline.
Data from 2 identical 14-week studies (an 8-week prospective ADT treatment phase and a 6-week randomized, double-blind phase) of aripiprazole augmentation were pooled to evaluate efficacy and safety in the 2 subgroups. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from end of ADT treatment to end of randomized treatment (last observation carried forward). Anxious depression was defined by a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression anxiety/somatization factor score ≥ 7, and atypical depression was defined by previously described criteria on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report. Both anxious and atypical subtypes were defined based on symptoms at entry into prospective ADT (week 0). Patients were enrolled between June 2004 and April 2006 in one study and from September 2004 to December 2006 in the other (total randomized population, N = 742; anxious/nonanxious population, N = 740; atypical/nonatypical population, N = 737).
Completion rates were between 84% and 90% and comparable across all subgroups, with low discontinuations due to adverse events. Patients receiving adjunctive aripiprazole demonstrated significantly greater improvement in MADRS total score versus patients receiving adjunctive placebo, starting at week 1 or week 2 and continuing through to endpoint (anxious: -8.72 vs. -6.17, p ≤ .001; nonanxious: -8.61 vs. -4.97, p ≤ .001; atypical: -9.31 vs. -5.15, p ≤ .001; nonatypical: -8.08 vs. -6.22, p < .05). At endpoint, remission rates were also significantly higher with adjunctive aripiprazole versus adjunctive placebo (p < .05) in all subgroups. Treatment emergent adverse event profile was similar in all subgroups and comparable to the total population. Reporting of akathisia and weight gain on aripiprazole treatment did not differ between subgroups.
Adjunctive aripiprazole is an effective treatment for patients with major depression presenting with either anxious or atypical features.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00095823 and NCT00095758.
评估阿立哌唑辅助标准抗抑郁治疗(ADT)对基线时伴有焦虑/非典型特征的DSM-IV重度抑郁症患者的疗效。
汇总两项相同的为期14周的阿立哌唑增效研究(一个为期8周的前瞻性ADT治疗阶段和一个为期6周的随机、双盲阶段)的数据,以评估两个亚组中的疗效和安全性。主要疗效终点是从ADT治疗结束到随机治疗结束(末次观察结转)时蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)总分的平均变化。焦虑性抑郁由汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表焦虑/躯体化因子得分≥7定义,非典型抑郁由先前描述的抑郁症状自评量表标准定义。焦虑和非典型亚型均根据进入前瞻性ADT(第0周)时的症状定义。一项研究中患者于2004年6月至2006年4月入组,另一项研究中患者于2004年9月至2006年12月入组(总随机人群,N = 742;焦虑/非焦虑人群,N = 740;非典型/非非典型人群,N = 737)。
完成率在84%至90%之间,所有亚组相当,因不良事件导致的停药率较低。接受阿立哌唑辅助治疗的患者与接受辅助安慰剂的患者相比,MADRS总分改善显著更大,从第1周或第2周开始并持续至终点(焦虑:-8.72对-6.17,p≤.001;非焦虑:-8.61对-4.97,p≤.001;非典型:-9.31对-5.15,p≤.001;非非典型:-8.08对-6.22,p<.05)。在终点时,所有亚组中阿立哌唑辅助治疗的缓解率也显著高于辅助安慰剂(p<.05)。所有亚组中治疗出现的不良事件情况相似,与总体人群相当。阿立哌唑治疗时静坐不能和体重增加的报告在亚组间无差异。
阿立哌唑辅助治疗对伴有焦虑或非典型特征的重度抑郁症患者是一种有效的治疗方法。
clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00095823和NCT00095758。