López-Bastida Julio, Hart Warren, García-Pérez Lidia, Linertová Renata
Evaluation and Planning Unit, Canary Islands Health Service, Spain.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;16(2):399-407. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2009-0965.
Available treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) need to be evaluated in order to determine whether the clinical benefits justify their additional costs. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of donepezil treatment compared with no-drug treatment of mild and moderate AD from the perspective of society and the health care system in Spain. A Markov model was designed to simulate the natural history of a cohort of patients with mild and moderate AD. Monthly transition probabilities were estimated from the international literature and donepezil clinical trials. Direct medical and non-medical costs and utilities were derived from Spanish studies. Local data on tolerance and medication withdrawal rates were incorporated into the model. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for a range of realistic treatment options were calculated. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was carried out using a Monte Carlo approach with 10,000 iterations. In the baseline scenario (24 months, patients initially with mild AD) incremental cost-effectiveness for direct medical costs was 20,353 euro/QALY. When all costs were taken into account, donepezil treatment was the dominant strategy. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios vary according to the selected perspective. For the baseline scenario, donepezil treatment is cost-effective with a probability of 95% for a threshold efficiency of 25,000 euro/QALY.
为了确定临床益处是否能证明阿尔茨海默病(AD)现有治疗方法的额外成本合理,需要对这些治疗方法进行评估。本研究从西班牙社会和医疗保健系统的角度,评估了多奈哌齐治疗与轻度和中度AD不使用药物治疗相比的成本效益。设计了一个马尔可夫模型来模拟一组轻度和中度AD患者的自然病程。每月的转移概率是根据国际文献和多奈哌齐临床试验估计的。直接医疗和非医疗成本以及效用来自西班牙的研究。关于耐受性和药物撤药率的本地数据被纳入模型。计算了一系列实际治疗方案的增量成本效益比。使用蒙特卡罗方法进行了10000次迭代的概率敏感性分析。在基线情景(24个月,最初为轻度AD患者)中,直接医疗成本的增量成本效益为20353欧元/质量调整生命年。当考虑所有成本时,多奈哌齐治疗是主导策略。增量成本效益比根据所选角度而有所不同。对于基线情景,多奈哌齐治疗具有成本效益,对于25000欧元/质量调整生命年的阈值效率,概率为95%。