Espirito-Santo Helena, Pio-Abreu Jose Luis
Departmento de Psicologia, Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra, Largo da Cruz de Celas, Coimbra, Portugal.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;43(3):270-6. doi: 10.1080/00048670802653307.
Conversion, dissociation and somatization are historically related in the long established concept of hysteria. Somewhere along the way they were separated due to the Cartesian dualistic view. The aim of the present study was to compare these pathologies and investigate whether symptoms of these pathologies overlap in their clinical appearance in a Portuguese sample.
Twenty-six patients with conversion disorder, 38 with dissociative disorders, 40 with somatization disorder, and a comparison group of 46 patients having other psychiatric disorders answered questions about dissociation (Dissociative Experiences Scale), somatoform dissociation (Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire), and psychopathological symptoms (Brief Symptom Inventory).
Dissociative and somatoform symptoms were significantly more frequent in dissociative and conversion disorder than in somatization disorder and controls. There were no significant differences between dissociative and conversion patients.
Conversion disorder is closely related to dissociative disorders. These results support the ICD-10 categorization of conversion disorder among dissociative disorders and the hypothesis of analogous psychopathological processes in conversion and dissociative disorders versus somatization disorder.
在癔症这一长期确立的概念中,转换、分离和躯体化在历史上是相关联的。在这一过程中,由于笛卡尔二元论观点,它们在某个阶段被分开了。本研究的目的是比较这些病症,并调查在葡萄牙样本中这些病症的症状在临床表现上是否存在重叠。
26名转换障碍患者、38名分离障碍患者、40名躯体化障碍患者,以及46名患有其他精神疾病的对照组患者回答了关于分离(分离体验量表)、躯体形式分离(躯体形式分离问卷)和精神病理症状(简明症状量表)的问题。
分离症状和躯体形式症状在分离障碍和转换障碍患者中比在躯体化障碍患者和对照组中更为常见。分离障碍患者和转换障碍患者之间没有显著差异。
转换障碍与分离障碍密切相关。这些结果支持了国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)将转换障碍归类于分离障碍之中,以及转换障碍和分离障碍与躯体化障碍存在类似精神病理过程的假设。