Panousi M N, Williams G J, Girdlestone S, Hiom S J, Maillard J-Y
Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009 May;48(5):648-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02574.x. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
During aseptic manufacturing and specifically during the transfer of items into an isolator, disinfection of surfaces is essential for reducing the risk of final product contamination. Surface disinfection can be carried out by a variety of methods, however the most accepted current practice is a combination of spraying with 70% alcohol and wiping. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two wipe systems by determining their ability to remove, kill and transfer bacterial contaminants from standardized surfaces.
The protocol used to achieve these objectives was based on a newly published method specifically designed to test wipes. Alcohol impregnated wipes performed better at reducing microbial bioburden than the alcohol spray/dry wipe applications. Impregnated wipes drastically reduced (1-2 log(10) reduction) a small bioburden (approx. 2 log(10)) of spores of Bacillus subtilis and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from the surface, but failed to remove (<0.2 log(10) reduction) Staphylococcus epidermidis. The alcohol spray/dry wipes did not manage to remove (<0.2 log(10) reduction) spore or bacterial bioburden from surfaces and was able to transfer some viable micro-organisms to other surfaces. Both wipe types showed poor antimicrobial efficacy (<1 log(10) reduction) against the test bacteria and spores.
As far as the authors are aware this is the first time that such a practical study has been reported and our results suggest that the best wipes for surface disinfection in aseptic units are the alcohol (IPA) impregnated wipes when compared with the dry wipes sprayed with alcohol.
The impregnated wipes performed better than the dry wipes sprayed with alcohol and should be used for surface disinfection in aseptic units.
在无菌生产过程中,特别是在将物品转移至隔离器的过程中,表面消毒对于降低最终产品污染风险至关重要。表面消毒可通过多种方法进行,然而目前最被认可的做法是用70%酒精喷洒并擦拭相结合。本研究的目的是通过测定两种擦拭系统从标准化表面去除、杀灭和转移细菌污染物的能力,来评估其有效性。
用于实现这些目标的方案基于一种新发表的专门设计用于测试擦拭布的方法。酒精浸渍擦拭布在降低微生物生物负荷方面比酒精喷雾/干擦拭应用表现更好。浸渍擦拭布能大幅降低(减少1 - 2个对数(10))枯草芽孢杆菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌表面少量生物负荷(约2个对数(10))的孢子,但未能去除(减少<0.2个对数(10))表皮葡萄球菌。酒精喷雾/干擦拭布未能从表面去除(减少<0.2个对数(10))孢子或细菌生物负荷,并且能够将一些活微生物转移到其他表面。两种擦拭布对测试细菌和孢子的抗菌效果均较差(减少<1个对数(10))。
据作者所知,这是首次报道此类实际研究,我们的结果表明,与酒精喷洒的干擦拭布相比,无菌单元中用于表面消毒的最佳擦拭布是酒精(异丙醇)浸渍擦拭布。
浸渍擦拭布比酒精喷洒的干擦拭布表现更好,应在无菌单元中用于表面消毒。