Magnotti Louis J, Schroeppel Thomas J, Clement L Paige, Swanson Joseph M, Bee Tiffany K, Maish George O, Minard Gayle, Zarzaur Ben L, Fischer Peter E, Fabian Timothy C, Croce Martin A
Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, USA.
J Trauma. 2009 Apr;66(4):1052-8; discussion 1058-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819a06e0.
Controversy persists regarding the optimal treatment regimen for Pseudomonas ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Combination antibiotic therapy is used to broaden the spectrum of activity of empiric treatment and provide synergistic bacteriocidal activity. The relevance of such "synergy" is commonly supposed but poorly supported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of monotherapy in the treatment of Pseudomonas VAP as measured by microbiological resolution.
Patients admitted to the trauma intensive care unit during a 36-month period with gram-negative VAP diagnosed on initial bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) (> or = 10(5) colony forming units [CFU]/mL) were evaluated. All patients received empiric antibiotic monotherapy based on the duration of intensive care unit stay. Patients with Pseudomonas VAP were identified and appropriate monotherapy was selected. Repeat BAL was performed on day 4 of appropriate antibiotic therapy to determine efficacy. Microbiological resolution was defined as < or = 10(3) CFU/mL. Combination therapy with an aminoglycoside was reserved for patients with either persistent positive or increasing colony counts on repeat BAL. Recurrence was defined as > or = 10(5) CFU/mL on subsequent BAL after 2 weeks of appropriate therapy.
One hundred ninety-six patients were identified with late gram-negative VAP. There were 84 patients with Pseudomonas VAP. Monotherapy achieved microbiological resolution in 79 patients (94.1%) with zero recurrence. Thirty-six isolates were completely eradicated at repeat BAL. Five patients (5.9%) required combination therapy to achieve resolution.
Monotherapy in the treatment of Pseudomonas VAP has an excellent success rate in patients with trauma. Empiric monotherapy therapy should be modified once susceptibility of the microorganism is documented (all isolates were sensitive to cefepime) and antibiotic choice should be based on local patterns of susceptibilities. The routine use of combination therapy for synergy is unnecessary. Combination therapy should be reserved for patients with persistent microbiological evidence of Pseudomonas VAP despite adequate therapy.
关于铜绿假单胞菌呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的最佳治疗方案仍存在争议。联合抗生素治疗用于扩大经验性治疗的活性谱并提供协同杀菌活性。这种“协同作用”的相关性通常被认为是存在的,但证据不足。本研究的目的是通过微生物学清除情况评估单药治疗铜绿假单胞菌VAP的疗效。
对在36个月期间入住创伤重症监护病房、初始支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)诊断为革兰阴性VAP(≥10⁵菌落形成单位[CFU]/mL)的患者进行评估。所有患者根据重症监护病房住院时间接受经验性抗生素单药治疗。确定患有铜绿假单胞菌VAP的患者并选择适当的单药治疗。在适当抗生素治疗的第4天进行重复BAL以确定疗效。微生物学清除定义为≤10³CFU/mL。对于重复BAL时菌落计数持续为阳性或增加的患者,保留氨基糖苷类联合治疗。复发定义为在适当治疗2周后的后续BAL中≥10⁵CFU/mL。
196例患者被诊断为晚期革兰阴性VAP。其中84例为铜绿假单胞菌VAP。单药治疗使79例患者(94.1%)实现微生物学清除,无复发。36株分离菌在重复BAL时被完全清除。5例患者(5.9%)需要联合治疗才能实现清除。
创伤患者中,单药治疗铜绿假单胞菌VAP成功率很高。一旦记录到微生物的药敏情况(所有分离菌对头孢吡肟敏感),应调整经验性单药治疗,抗生素选择应基于当地的药敏模式。常规使用联合治疗以实现协同作用是不必要的。联合治疗应仅用于尽管进行了充分治疗但仍有铜绿假单胞菌VAP持续微生物学证据的患者。