Lee Evan, Braund Rhiannon, Tordoff June
Pharmacy@carefirst, New Plymouth, New Zealand.
N Z Med J. 2009 Apr 24;122(1293):3566.
To determine where in New Zealand collaborative Medication Use Review and Adherence Support (MUR) services were provided by pharmacists, to identify the processes involved, and pharmacists' perceptions of the service.
A questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey was undertaken of 68 of 71 MUR accredited pharmacists that were contactable in May 2008.
Fifty-four (79%) of the 68 accredited pharmacists completed the survey. Services were provided in 5/21 (24%) district health boards (DHBs) by 39 pharmacists from 33/897 (3.7%) pharmacies. The eligibility criteria for patients were highly consistent across the DHBs. The median time for pharmacists conducting their initial MUR consultation was 57 minutes. All pharmacists perceived this service to be highly (93%) or moderately valuable (7%) to patients. The main limitations to providing this service were identified as 'no current contract with funders', 'insufficient time', and 'personal circumstances'.
By May 2008, collaborative medication review services (MURs) were provided in five DHBs by 39 pharmacists. Limited time since launch and the need for local contract negotiations may have contributed to current participation rates. Studies should be undertaken as the service grows to establish the stakeholders' perceptions of the service, and the impact of MURs on the health outcomes of patients.
确定在新西兰药剂师提供协作式药物使用评估及依从性支持(MUR)服务的地点,识别其中涉及的流程以及药剂师对该服务的看法。
于2008年5月对71名获得MUR认证且可联系到的药剂师中的68名进行了基于问卷调查的横断面调查。
68名获得认证的药剂师中有54名(79%)完成了调查。39名药剂师从897家药店中的33家(3.7%)在5个地区卫生委员会(DHB)中提供了服务。各地区卫生委员会对患者的资格标准高度一致。药剂师进行首次MUR咨询的中位时间为57分钟。所有药剂师都认为该服务对患者非常有价值(93%)或有一定价值(7%)。提供这项服务的主要限制因素被确定为“目前未与资助者签订合同”、“时间不足”和“个人情况”。
截至2008年5月,39名药剂师在5个地区卫生委员会提供了协作式药物评估服务(MUR)。自推出以来时间有限以及需要进行当地合同谈判可能导致了目前的参与率。随着该服务的发展,应开展研究以确定利益相关者对该服务的看法,以及MUR对患者健康结果的影响。