Dharaskar Anand, Mandhani Anil
Department of Urology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India.
Indian J Urol. 2008 Oct;24(4):513-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.44259.
The field of Urology in Medicine has witnessed tremendous advancement in technology and in accordance with it. Endourology has taken a leap ahead in terms of stone management. Most of the stones could be treated with semi-rigid ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and ESWL and some would need Flexible ureteroscopy. Flexible ureteroscopy has been primarily indicated to treat ESWL resistant renal stones but with changes in the technology of incorporating secondary active deflection and availability of laser fibres, its horizon for indications to treat stones is being widened. Though Flexible ureteroscopy is being used to treat stones of various sizes and locations, its cost effectiveness is debatable. Should it be used ubiquitously to treat stones amenable to PNL or ESWL is a big question we need to answer. As of now true indications of Flexible ureteroscopy are limited and there is an urgent need for a randomized trial to compare its efficacy with ESWL and PNL for renal and upper ureteric stones.
医学领域的泌尿外科见证了技术的巨大进步,与之相应,腔内泌尿外科在结石治疗方面取得了飞跃。大多数结石可用半硬性输尿管镜、经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)和体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗,有些则需要软性输尿管镜。软性输尿管镜最初主要用于治疗对ESWL抵抗的肾结石,但随着结合二次主动偏转技术的发展以及激光纤维的应用,其治疗结石的适应证范围正在扩大。尽管软性输尿管镜可用于治疗各种大小和位置的结石,但其成本效益仍存在争议。是否应普遍使用它来治疗适合PNL或ESWL的结石是一个我们需要回答的重大问题。目前,软性输尿管镜的真正适应证有限,迫切需要进行一项随机试验,以比较其与ESWL和PNL治疗肾及上段输尿管结石的疗效。