Suppr超能文献

抗癫痫药物替换对需要急诊护理的癫痫发作事件的影响。

Effects of antiepileptic drug substitutions on epileptic events requiring acute care.

作者信息

Rascati Karen L, Richards Kristin M, Johnsrud Michael T, Mann Teresa A

机构信息

College of Pharmacy and the Center for Pharmacoeconomic Studies, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2009 Jul;29(7):769-74. doi: 10.1592/phco.29.7.769.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the odds of antiepileptic drug substitution among patients who had an epileptic event requiring acute care-ambulance service, emergency department visit, or hospitalization-relative to patients who did not have an event, and to compare these results with those from a recent study involving a similar method but different patients.

DESIGN

Case-control analysis.

DATA SOURCE

United States health care claims from the PharMetrics database.

PATIENTS

A cohort of patients aged 12-64 years with a primary diagnosis of epilepsy between October 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006; 991 cases (patients who experienced an epileptic event requiring acute care) and 2973 controls (patients who did not have an event) were matched in a 1:3 ratio for sex, age, and type of epilepsy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Using discordant pairs analysis, we calculated the odds ratio of an epileptic event that required acute care occurring in patients whose antiepileptic drug underwent substitution to an A-rated (therapeutically equivalent) alternative (switch from branded product to generic, generic to branded, or generic to generic) versus those whose drugs were not substituted. For matched data, 109 (11.0%) of 991 cases had an A-rated antiepileptic drug substitution in the 6 months before the event, whereas only 186 (6.3%) of 2973 controls had a substitution (odds ratio 1.84, 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.36). Our results were similar to those of a previous study involving a different patient database, which showed substitution rates of 11.3% for cases versus 6.5% for controls (odds ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.25-2.63). Our sensitivity analyses were robust, and we found a temporal relationship in that numerous substitutions occurred in the month before the acute event.

CONCLUSION

Patients who had an epileptic event requiring acute care were about 80% more likely than matched controls without an acute event to have recently had an antiepileptic drug substitution. Our replication of a previously published case-control analysis revealed a similar association between substitution involving A-rated antiepileptic drugs and subsequent epileptic events requiring acute care, thereby lending credibility to the findings.

摘要

研究目的

确定与未发生癫痫事件的患者相比,因癫痫事件需要急诊救护服务、前往急诊科就诊或住院治疗的患者中抗癫痫药物替换的几率,并将这些结果与近期一项采用类似方法但研究对象不同的研究结果进行比较。

设计

病例对照分析。

数据来源

来自PharMetrics数据库的美国医疗保健理赔数据。

患者

一组年龄在12 - 64岁之间、2005年10月1日至2006年12月31日期间原发性诊断为癫痫的患者;991例病例(经历需要急诊治疗的癫痫事件的患者)和2973例对照(未发生癫痫事件的患者)按1:3的比例在性别、年龄和癫痫类型方面进行匹配。

测量指标及主要结果

采用不一致配对分析,我们计算了抗癫痫药物被替换为A级(治疗等效)替代药物(从品牌产品换为仿制药、从仿制药换为品牌药或从仿制药换为仿制药)的患者发生需要急诊治疗的癫痫事件的几率比,与药物未被替换的患者进行对比。对于匹配数据,991例病例中有109例(11.0%)在事件发生前6个月内有A级抗癫痫药物替换,而2973例对照中只有186例(6.3%)有替换(几率比1.84,95%置信区间1.44 - 2.36)。我们的结果与之前一项涉及不同患者数据库的研究结果相似,该研究显示病例组的替换率为11.3%,对照组为6.5%(几率比1.81,95%置信区间1.25 - 2.63)。我们的敏感性分析结果可靠,并且发现了一种时间关系,即大量替换发生在急性事件发生前的一个月内。

结论

与未发生急性事件的匹配对照相比,因癫痫事件需要急诊治疗的患者近期进行抗癫痫药物替换的可能性大约高80%。我们对之前发表的病例对照分析的重复研究揭示了涉及A级抗癫痫药物替换与随后需要急诊治疗的癫痫事件之间存在类似关联,从而为这些研究结果提供了可信度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验