Higa Gerald M, Abraham Jame
Associate Professor, Schools of Pharmacy and Medicine and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009 Jul;9(7):999-1007. doi: 10.1586/era.09.68.
The perception that inhibition of cancer-associated angiogenesis would be an effective treatment strategy was based on the fundamental difference in cell cycle activity between neoplastic and normal endothelial cells. Selective targeting of tumor vessels could have additional benefits, such as circumventing development of acquired resistance to these types of agents, overcoming intrinsic tumor resistance, exhibiting broad anti-tumor activity and decreasing normal tissue toxicity. Successful translation of anti-angiogenic therapy into the clinical setting was achieved only 5 years ago with the approval of bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. Although the benefits demonstrated in clinical trials led to the approval of bevacizumab for treatment of colorectal, lung and breast cancers, and most recently glioblastoma, a number of serious soft-tissue and vascular toxicities have also been observed in patients receiving this anti-angiogenic agent. This review assesses the relationship between inhibition of VEGF and toxicity, and proposes the pathogenic mechanisms that lead to the adverse events.
认为抑制癌症相关血管生成将是一种有效治疗策略的观点,是基于肿瘤性内皮细胞与正常内皮细胞在细胞周期活性上的根本差异。对肿瘤血管的选择性靶向可能还有其他益处,比如规避对这类药物获得性耐药的发生、克服肿瘤内在耐药性、展现广泛的抗肿瘤活性以及降低正常组织毒性。仅在5年前,随着贝伐单抗被批准用于治疗转移性结直肠癌,抗血管生成疗法才成功转化到临床应用中。尽管临床试验中所显示的益处使得贝伐单抗被批准用于治疗结直肠癌、肺癌和乳腺癌,以及最近用于治疗胶质母细胞瘤,但在接受这种抗血管生成药物治疗的患者中,也观察到了一些严重的软组织和血管毒性。本综述评估了抑制血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)与毒性之间的关系,并提出了导致这些不良事件的致病机制。