Fooks Anthony R, Johnson Nicholas, Freuling Conrad M, Wakeley Philip R, Banyard Ashley C, McElhinney Lorraine M, Marston Denise A, Dastjerdi Akbar, Wright Edward, Weiss Robin A, Müller Thomas
Rabies and Wildlife Zoonoses Group, Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA, Weybridge), WHO Collaborating Centre for the Characterisation of Rabies and Rabies-related Viruses, New Haw, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009 Sep 29;3(9):e530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000530.
The diagnosis of rabies is routinely based on clinical and epidemiological information, especially when exposures are reported in rabies-endemic countries. Diagnostic tests using conventional assays that appear to be negative, even when undertaken late in the disease and despite the clinical diagnosis, have a tendency, at times, to be unreliable. These tests are rarely optimal and entirely dependent on the nature and quality of the sample supplied. In the course of the past three decades, the application of molecular biology has aided in the development of tests that result in a more rapid detection of rabies virus. These tests enable viral strain identification from clinical specimens. Currently, there are a number of molecular tests that can be used to complement conventional tests in rabies diagnosis. Indeed the challenges in the 21st century for the development of rabies diagnostics are not of a technical nature; these tests are available now. The challenges in the 21st century for diagnostic test developers are two-fold: firstly, to achieve internationally accepted validation of a test that will then lead to its acceptance by organisations globally. Secondly, the areas of the world where such tests are needed are mainly in developing regions where financial and logistical barriers prevent their implementation. Although developing countries with a poor healthcare infrastructure recognise that molecular-based diagnostic assays will be unaffordable for routine use, the cost/benefit ratio should still be measured. Adoption of rapid and affordable rabies diagnostic tests for use in developing countries highlights the importance of sharing and transferring technology through laboratory twinning between the developed and the developing countries. Importantly for developing countries, the benefit of molecular methods as tools is the capability for a differential diagnosis of human diseases that present with similar clinical symptoms. Antemortem testing for human rabies is now possible using molecular techniques. These barriers are not insurmountable and it is our expectation that if such tests are accepted and implemented where they are most needed, they will provide substantial improvements for rabies diagnosis and surveillance. The advent of molecular biology and new technological initiatives that combine advances in biology with other disciplines will support the development of techniques capable of high throughput testing with a low turnaround time for rabies diagnosis.
狂犬病的诊断通常基于临床和流行病学信息,尤其是在狂犬病流行国家报告有暴露情况时。使用传统检测方法的诊断测试有时似乎呈阴性,即便在疾病后期进行检测且尽管有临床诊断,这些测试也往往不可靠。这些测试很少是最佳的,且完全取决于所提供样本的性质和质量。在过去三十年中,分子生物学的应用有助于开发能更快速检测狂犬病病毒的测试。这些测试能够从临床标本中鉴定病毒株。目前,有多种分子测试可用于补充狂犬病诊断中的传统测试。事实上,21世纪狂犬病诊断技术开发面临的挑战并非技术性质的;这些测试现在已有。21世纪诊断测试开发者面临的挑战有两方面:其一,要实现一项测试获得国际认可的验证,进而使其被全球各组织接受。其二,需要此类测试的世界区域主要在发展中地区,那里的资金和后勤障碍阻碍了它们的实施。尽管医疗保健基础设施薄弱的发展中国家认识到基于分子的诊断检测常规使用起来负担不起,但仍应衡量成本效益比。在发展中国家采用快速且经济实惠的狂犬病诊断测试凸显了通过发达国家与发展中国家之间的实验室结对来分享和转让技术的重要性。对发展中国家而言重要的是,分子方法作为工具的益处在于能够对具有相似临床症状的人类疾病进行鉴别诊断。现在使用分子技术进行人类狂犬病的生前检测是可行的。这些障碍并非无法克服,我们期望如果此类测试在最需要的地方被接受并实施,它们将为狂犬病诊断和监测带来实质性改善。分子生物学的出现以及将生物学进展与其他学科相结合的新技术举措将支持开发能够进行高通量测试且狂犬病诊断周转时间短的技术。