Suppr超能文献

选择性术前胆道引流对接受胰十二指肠切除术患者围手术期复苏、发病率和死亡率的影响可忽略不计。

Negligible effect of selective preoperative biliary drainage on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

作者信息

Coates Jodi M, Beal Shannon H, Russo Jack E, Vanderveen Kimberly A, Chen Steven L, Bold Richard J, Canter Robert J

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, UC Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2009 Sep;144(9):841-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.152.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of selective preoperative biliary drainage (BD) on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Biliary drainage prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy remains controversial. Proponents argue that it facilitates referral to high-volume tertiary centers, while detractors maintain that it increases surgical morbidity and mortality.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of single-institution tumor registry database.

SETTING

University medical center.

PATIENTS

From October 1, 2003, to May 31, 2008, 90 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary mass lesions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinicopathologic data were reviewed and analyzed among patients who did and did not receive BD for their association with perioperative outcomes. chi(2) Analysis, independent-samples t tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used as appropriate.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (62%) underwent BD, and 34 (38%) did not. Intraoperative bile cultures were positive for 1 or more species of microorganisms in 88% of stented patients (35 of 40). There were no significant differences in fluid requirements, transfusion requirements, or surgery duration between patients who did and did not undergo BD. Estimated blood loss was increased in patients who received BD (625 mL vs 525 mL in patients who did not undergo BD; P = .03), while reoperation was significantly more common in nonstented patients (4% vs 15% in patients who did not undergo BD; P = .02). Intensive care unit stay, overall length of stay, pancreatic leak/abscess/fistula, infectious complications, postoperative percutaneous drainage, hospital readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although preoperative biliary stents may complicate the intraoperative management and lessen the postoperative complications of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, only estimated blood loss and reoperation were significantly different in this cohort. Further study may reveal patient subgroups who may specifically benefit or suffer from preoperative biliary stenting. Currently, selective preoperative BD appears appropriate in the multidisciplinary management of patients with periampullary lesions.

摘要

目的

探讨术前选择性胆道引流(BD)对接受胰十二指肠切除术患者围手术期复苏、发病率和死亡率的影响。胰十二指肠切除术前的胆道引流仍存在争议。支持者认为它有助于将患者转诊至高容量的三级中心,而反对者则认为它会增加手术发病率和死亡率。

设计

对单机构肿瘤登记数据库进行回顾性分析。

地点

大学医学中心。

患者

2003年10月1日至2008年5月31日,90例患者因壶腹周围肿块性病变接受胰十二指肠切除术。

主要观察指标

对接受和未接受BD的患者的临床病理数据进行回顾和分析,以探讨其与围手术期结局的相关性。根据情况使用卡方分析、独立样本t检验和曼-惠特尼U检验。

结果

56例患者(62%)接受了BD,34例(38%)未接受。88%的置管患者(40例中的35例)术中胆汁培养发现1种或多种微生物呈阳性。接受和未接受BD的患者在液体需求量、输血需求量或手术持续时间方面无显著差异。接受BD的患者估计失血量增加(625 mL对未接受BD的患者为525 mL;P = 0.03),而未置管患者再次手术更为常见(4%对未接受BD的患者为15%;P = 0.02)。两组患者在重症监护病房住院时间、总住院时间、胰瘘/脓肿/瘘、感染性并发症、术后经皮引流、医院再入院以及30天和90天死亡率方面无显著差异。

结论

虽然术前胆道支架可能会使接受胰十二指肠切除术患者的术中管理复杂化并减少术后并发症,但在该队列中只有估计失血量和再次手术有显著差异。进一步研究可能会揭示哪些患者亚组可能特别受益于或因术前胆道支架置入而受损。目前,术前选择性BD在壶腹周围病变患者的多学科管理中似乎是合适的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验