Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜中层厚度预测心血管风险的价值。

The value of carotid intima-media thickness for predicting cardiovascular risk.

机构信息

Service de Cardiologie Prêventive, Hôpital Europêen Georges Pompidou, Universitê Paris-Descartes, INSERM U970, 75015 Paris, France.

出版信息

Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010 Feb;30(2):182-5. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.196980. Epub 2009 Nov 30.

Abstract

We reviewed prospective epidemiological data in the general population, mostly middle-aged to older persons, to determine the association of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) (assessed by B-mode ultrasonography) with cardiovascular risk. Reported risks were expressed as absolute (event risk per persons-years in subjects with a high CIMT) and relative (hazard ratio of high vs low CIMT). They were hardly comparable as the result of differences between the analyzed studies, including the site and procedure of CIMT measurement, the report of adjusted or unadjusted models, and the arbitrary cutoff point to evaluate the CIMTAEs ability to predict risk. Despite these heterogeneities, the following four main conclusions emerged: (1) CIMT was an independent but relatively modest (as judged by absolute risk) predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD); (2) CIMT was an independent predictor for stroke, slightly better than for CHD as judged by the relative risks of both events; (3) CIMT added little to the CHD prediction by risk factors, as judged by c statistic and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (however, appropriate data for stroke on this important issue were lacking); and (4) the CHD prediction by CIMT was inferior to that by ultrasonography-assessed carotid plaque because plaque may be more representative of atherosclerosis than CIMT.

摘要

我们回顾了主要为中老年人的一般人群中的前瞻性流行病学数据,以确定颈动脉内膜-中层厚度(CIMT)(通过 B 型超声评估)与心血管风险的关联。报告的风险表示为绝对风险(高 CIMT 受试者的每人数年事件风险)和相对风险(高 vs 低 CIMT 的风险比)。由于分析研究之间的差异,包括 CIMT 测量的部位和程序、调整和未调整模型的报告以及评估 CIMT 预测风险能力的任意截止点,这些风险很难进行比较。尽管存在这些异质性,但仍得出以下四个主要结论:(1)CIMT 是冠心病(CHD)的独立但相对适度(根据绝对风险判断)的预测指标;(2)CIMT 是中风的独立预测指标,其相对风险略高于 CHD;(3)根据 C 统计量和接受者操作特征曲线分析,CIMT 对危险因素预测 CHD 的作用不大(然而,在这个重要问题上缺乏关于中风的适当数据);(4)CIMT 预测 CHD 的能力不如超声评估颈动脉斑块,因为斑块可能比 CIMT 更能代表动脉粥样硬化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验