Suppr超能文献

放射治疗中改变的分割方案。

Altered fractionation schemes in radiotherapy.

作者信息

Stuschke Martin, Pöttgen Christoph

出版信息

Front Radiat Ther Oncol. 2010;42:150-156. doi: 10.1159/000262470. Epub 2009 Nov 24.

Abstract

Hyperfractionation and hypofractionation combined with acceleration have been investigated in stage I-III NSCLC patients. In stage I tumors, hypofractionated radiation schedules given with highly conformal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) techniques have been proven safe and effective with local control rates > 85% and meanwhile have been accepted as the standard treatment in stage I patients who are medically unfit for surgery or who refuse resection. When comparing the dose-effect relationship derived from local control data of various clinical studies using conventional fractionation (CF) with that obtained from SBRT trials using doses per fraction from 7.5 to 30 Gy based on the linear quadratic model without parameters considering repopulation or hypoxia, the alpha/beta ratio for biological equivalent doses with the different fractionation schedules was found to be 8.2 (7.0-9.4) Gy for stage I NSCLC. From this, it can be concluded that using an alpha/beta value of 10 Gy for tumors is conservative, underestimating the BED of SBRT schedules relative to CF schedules with regard to tumor control. If repopulation is the dominant resistance-promoting factor for CF schedules and hypoxia for hypofractionated SBRT schedules, and the true alpha/beta value of tumors is assumed to be 10 Gy, then the observed alpha/beta value of 8.2 Gy can imply that the effect of repopulation during CF is higher than the effect of hypoxia during SBRT. Patients with locally advanced NSCLC in whom contraindications preclude the use of concurrent chemotherapy with CF radiotherapy may be treated outside clinical trials with CHART. Combinations of hyperfractionated-accelerated RT schedules with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy have been proven safe and effective in stage III NSCLC patients.

摘要

在I - III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,已经对超分割和低分割联合加速放疗进行了研究。在I期肿瘤中,采用高度适形的立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)技术给予的低分割放疗方案已被证明是安全有效的,局部控制率> 85%,同时已被接受为那些因医学原因不适于手术或拒绝手术切除的I期患者的标准治疗方法。当将使用常规分割(CF)的各种临床研究的局部控制数据得出的剂量 - 效应关系与基于线性二次模型、不考虑再增殖或缺氧参数、每次分割剂量为7.5至30 Gy的SBRT试验获得的剂量 - 效应关系进行比较时,发现I期NSCLC生物等效剂量的不同分割方案的α/β比值为8.2(7.0 - 9.4)Gy。由此可以得出结论,对于肿瘤使用10 Gy的α/β值是保守的,相对于CF方案,在肿瘤控制方面低估了SBRT方案的生物等效剂量(BED)。如果再增殖是CF方案的主要抗性促进因素,而缺氧是低分割SBRT方案的主要抗性促进因素,并且假设肿瘤的真实α/β值为10 Gy,那么观察到的8.2 Gy的α/β值可能意味着CF期间再增殖的影响高于SBRT期间缺氧的影响。对于局部晚期NSCLC患者,若存在禁忌证而不能将CF放疗与同步化疗联合使用,则可在临床试验之外采用CHART进行治疗。超分割加速放疗方案与基于铂的同步化疗联合应用已被证明在III期NSCLC患者中是安全有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验