Centre of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine Utrecht, Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010 Mar;52(3):e60-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03525.x. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between gross motor capacity and daily-life mobility in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and to explore the moderation of this relationship by the severity of CP.
Cross-sectional analysis in a cohort study with a clinic-based sample of children with CP (n=116; 76 males, 40 females; mean age 6 y 3 mo, SD 12 mo, range 4 y 8 mo-7 y 7 mo) was performed. Gross motor capacity was assessed by the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66). Daily-life mobility was assessed using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI): Functional Skills Scale (FSS mobility) and Caregiver Assistance Scale (CAS mobility). Severity of CP was classified by the Gross Motor Function Classification System (48% level I, 17% level II, 15% level III, 8% level IV, 12% level V), type of motor impairment (85% spastic, 12% dyskinetic, 3% ataxic), and limb distribution (36% unilateral, 49% bilateral spastic).
Scores on the GMFM-66 explained 90% and 84% respectively, of the variance of scores on PEDI-FSS mobility and PEDI-CAS mobility. Limb distribution moderated the relationship between scores on the GMFM-66 and the PEDI-FSS mobility, revealing a weaker relationship in children with unilateral spastic CP (24% explained variance) than in children with bilateral spastic CP (91% explained variance).
In children aged 4 to 7 years with unilateral spastic CP, dissociation between gross motor capacity and daily-life mobility can be observed, just as in typically developing peers.
本研究旨在探讨脑瘫(CP)患儿粗大运动能力与日常生活活动能力的关系,并探讨 CP 严重程度对此关系的调节作用。
对 116 例 CP 患儿(男 76 例,女 40 例;平均年龄 6 岁 3 个月,标准差 12 个月,范围 4 岁 8 个月至 7 岁 7 个月)进行基于诊所的队列研究的横断面分析。粗大运动能力采用粗大运动功能测量量表(GMFM-66)评估。日常生活活动能力采用小儿残疾评估量表(PEDI):功能技能量表(FSS 移动)和照顾者协助量表(CAS 移动)评估。CP 严重程度采用粗大运动功能分类系统(48%为 I 级,17%为 II 级,15%为 III 级,8%为 IV 级,12%为 V 级)、运动障碍类型(85%痉挛型,12%运动障碍型,3%共济失调型)和肢体分布(36%单侧,49%双侧痉挛型)进行分类。
GMFM-66 评分分别解释了 PEDI-FSS 移动评分和 PEDI-CAS 移动评分的 90%和 84%的变异。肢体分布调节了 GMFM-66 评分与 PEDI-FSS 移动评分之间的关系,表明单侧痉挛型 CP 儿童(解释方差 24%)之间的关系较弱,而双侧痉挛型 CP 儿童(解释方差 91%)之间的关系较强。
在 4 至 7 岁的单侧痉挛型 CP 儿童中,与典型发育的同龄人一样,可能会观察到粗大运动能力与日常生活活动能力之间的分离。