Suppr超能文献

在中国青岛,使用 A1C 和空腹毛细血管血糖检测筛查新诊断的糖尿病和口服葡萄糖耐量试验定义的糖尿病前期的性能。

Performance of an A1C and fasting capillary blood glucose test for screening newly diagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes defined by an oral glucose tolerance test in Qingdao, China.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):545-50. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1410. Epub 2009 Dec 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The study's goal was to evaluate the performance of A1C and fasting capillary blood glucose (FCG) tests as mass screening tools for diabetes and pre-diabetes, as determined by the standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Data from 2,332 individuals aged 35-74 years who participated in a population-based cross-sectional diabetes survey in Qingdao, China, were analyzed. A 2-h 75-g OGTT was used to diagnose diabetes. The performance of A1C and FCG was evaluated against the results of the OGTTs by using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. RESULTS The prevalence of newly diagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes (impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance) was 11.9 and 29.5%, respectively. For subjects with newly diagnosed diabetes, the area under the ROC curve was 0.67 for A1C and 0.77 for FCG (P < 0.01) in men and 0.67 and 0.75 (P < 0.01) in women, whereas for pre-diabetes, these values were 0.47 and 0.64 (P < 0.001) in men and 0.51 and 0.65 (P < 0.001) in women. At the optimal A1C cutoff point of > or =5.6% for newly diagnosed diabetes, sensitivities (specificities) were 64.4% (61.6%) for men and 62.3% (63.3%) for women. CONCLUSIONS As a screening tool for newly diagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes, the FCG measurement performed better than A1C in this general Chinese population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估糖化血红蛋白(A1C)和空腹毛细血管血糖(FCG)检测作为糖尿病和糖尿病前期的大规模筛查工具的性能,其诊断标准为标准口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。

研究设计和方法

对 2332 名年龄在 35-74 岁的个体进行了分析,这些个体参加了中国青岛一项基于人群的横断面糖尿病调查。采用 2 小时 75 g OGTT 诊断糖尿病。使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析评估 A1C 和 FCG 与 OGTT 结果的相关性。

结果

新诊断的糖尿病和糖尿病前期(空腹血糖受损和/或糖耐量受损)的患病率分别为 11.9%和 29.5%。对于新诊断的糖尿病患者,A1C 的 ROC 曲线下面积在男性为 0.67,在女性为 0.77(P < 0.01),FCG 的 ROC 曲线下面积在男性为 0.77,在女性为 0.75(P < 0.01);对于糖尿病前期,男性的 A1C 切点为 >或=5.6%时,其灵敏度(特异性)分别为 64.4%(61.6%),女性的 A1C 切点为 >或=5.6%时,其灵敏度(特异性)分别为 62.3%(63.3%)。

结论

在一般中国人群中,作为新诊断糖尿病和糖尿病前期的筛查工具,FCG 检测的性能优于 A1C。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b37a/2827505/92907a1de7d8/zdc0031080850001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验