Suppr超能文献

比较腹膜透析和血液透析的糖尿病患者糖化白蛋白和血红蛋白 A1c 浓度。

Comparison of glycated albumin and hemoglobin A1c concentrations in diabetic subjects on peritoneal and hemodialysis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1053, USA.

出版信息

Perit Dial Int. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):72-9. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2008.00243.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Relative to hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), percentage of glycated albumin (GA%) more accurately reflects recent glycemic control in diabetic hemodialysis (HD) patients.

METHODS

To determine the accuracy of glycemic assays in a larger sample including patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD), HbA(1c) and GA% were measured in 519 diabetic subjects: 55 on PD, 415 on HD, and 49 non-nephropathy controls.

RESULTS

Mean +/- SD serum glucose levels were higher in HD and PD patients relative to non-nephropathy controls (HD 169.7 +/- 62 mg/dL, PD 168.6 +/- 66 mg/dL, controls 146.1 +/- 66 mg/dL; p = 0.03 HD vs controls, p = 0.13 PD vs controls). GA% was also higher in HD and PD patients (HD 20.6% +/- 8.0%, PD 19.0% +/- 5.7%, controls 15.7% +/- 7.7%; p < 0.02 HD vs controls and PD vs controls). HbA(1c) was paradoxically lower in dialysis patients (HD 6.78% +/- 1.6%, PD 6.87% +/- 1.4%, controls 7.3% +/- 1.4%; p = 0.03 HD vs controls, p = 0.12 PD vs controls). The serum glucose/HbA(1c) ratio differed significantly between dialysis patients and controls (p < 0.0001 HD vs controls, p = 0.002 PD vs controls), while serum glucose/GA% ratio was similar across groups (p = 0.96 HD vs controls, p = 0.64 PD vs controls). In best-fit multivariate models with HbA(1c) or GA% as outcome variable, dialysis status was a significant predictor of HbA(1c) but not GA%.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between HbA(1c) and GA% differs in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease who perform either PD or HD compared to those without nephropathy. HbA(1c) significantly underestimates glycemic control in peritoneal and hemodialysis patients relative to GA%.

摘要

背景

与血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)相比,糖化白蛋白百分比(GA%)更能准确反映糖尿病血液透析(HD)患者的近期血糖控制情况。

方法

为了在更大的样本中确定血糖检测的准确性,我们测量了 519 例糖尿病患者的 HbA1c 和 GA%:55 例接受腹膜透析(PD),415 例接受 HD,49 例非肾病对照组。

结果

与非肾病对照组相比,HD 和 PD 患者的血清葡萄糖水平更高(HD 为 169.7±62mg/dL,PD 为 168.6±66mg/dL,对照组为 146.1±66mg/dL;p=0.03,HD 与对照组相比,p=0.13,PD 与对照组相比)。HD 和 PD 患者的 GA%也更高(HD 为 20.6%±8.0%,PD 为 19.0%±5.7%,对照组为 15.7%±7.7%;p<0.02,HD 与对照组和 PD 与对照组相比)。令人惊讶的是,透析患者的 HbA1c 反而较低(HD 为 6.78%±1.6%,PD 为 6.87%±1.4%,对照组为 7.3%±1.4%;p=0.03,HD 与对照组相比,p=0.12,PD 与对照组相比)。透析患者与对照组之间的血清葡萄糖/HbA1c 比值差异显著(p<0.0001,HD 与对照组相比,p=0.002,PD 与对照组相比),而血清葡萄糖/GA%比值在各组之间相似(p=0.96,HD 与对照组相比,p=0.64,PD 与对照组相比)。在以 HbA1c 或 GA%为因变量的最佳拟合多元模型中,透析状态是 HbA1c 的显著预测因素,但不是 GA%的预测因素。

结论

与无肾病的患者相比,接受腹膜透析或血液透析的终末期肾病糖尿病患者的 HbA1c 与 GA%之间的关系不同。HbA1c 显著低估了腹膜透析和血液透析患者的血糖控制情况,而 GA%则相反。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验