Suppr超能文献

[鼠疫亚单位疫苗免疫保护效果评价]

[Evaluation of immunization protection efficacy of plague subunit vaccine].

作者信息

Zhang Qing-wen, Qi Zhi-zhen, Xin You-quan, Yang Yong-hai, Wu Hai-lian, Yang Han-qing, Feng Jian-ping, Jin Xing, Cui Bai-zhong, Wang Tang, Wu Ben-chuan, Qiu Ye-feng, Wang Wang, Guo Zhao-biao, Wang Zu-yun, Yang Rui-fu, Wang Hu, Wang Xiao-yi

机构信息

Qinghai Institute for Endemic Disease Prevention and Control of Qinghai Province, Xining, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Sep;43(9):785-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the protective efficacy of plague subunit vaccine, BALB/c mice, guinea pigs and rabbits were used in this study.

METHODS

Groups of mice (10 per group), guinea pigs (14 per group) and rabbits (6 per group) were immunized with F1 + rV270 vaccine, EV76 vaccine and alum adjuvant by intramuscular route, respectively. Serum antibody titres of mice, guinea pigs and rabbits were determined by ELISA and the immunized animals were challenged with 10(6) CFU of Y. pestis strain 141 at the 8th week after the primary immunization.

RESULTS

The immunized mice, guinea pigs or rabbits with subunit vaccine developed anti-F1 IgG titre of 41 587.3 +/- 2.1, 11 543.7 +/- 2.1 or 522.4 +/- 22.4 and elicited statistical anti-F1 IgG titre difference among them (F = 17.58, P < 0.01). The immunized mice, guinea pigs or rabbits with subunit vaccine had anti-rV270 IgG titre of 15 748.7 +/- 1.6, 12.6 +/- 1.4 or 1648.0 +/- 5.0 and induced statistical anti-rV270 IgG titre difference among them (F value was 16.34, P < 0.01). There was significant anti-F1 IgG titre difference among mice, guinea pigs and rabbits immunized with EV76 vaccine that developed anti-F1 IgG titre of 913.4 +/- 4.5, 937.0 +/- 2.0 or 342.0 +/- 12.0 (F = 23.67, P < 0.01), whereas the immunized mice, guinea pigs and rabbits with EV76 vaccine developed anti-rV270 IgG titre of 12.0 +/- 1.0, 447.0 +/- 10.0, 40.0 +/- 11.0 and there was no anti-rV270 IgG titre difference between them (F = 2.20, P = 0.1314). The immunized mice with subunit vaccine developed significantly higher anti-F1 IgG titres than immunized guinea pigs and rabbits (q value was 30.57 and 19.04, respectively, P < 0.01), and there were no anti-F1 IgG titre differences between the immunized guinea pigs and rabbits (q = 0.04, P = 0.8485). The immunized mice with subunit vaccine developed significantly higher anti-rV270 IgG titres than immunized guinea pigs and rabbits (q value was 27.10 and 19.49, respectively, P < 0.01), and there were no anti-rV270 IgG titre differences between the immunized guinea pigs and rabbits with the subunit vaccine (q = 0.25, P = 0.6187). The immunized mice with EV76 elicited higher anti-F1 IgG titres than immunized guinea pigs and rabbits (q value was 40.67 and 29.10, respectively, P < 0.01), whereas there was no difference of F1 IgG titer between immunized guinea pigs and rabbits (q = 0.06, P = 0.8098). The immunized mice, guinea pigs and rabbits with subunit vaccine provided 100% (10/10), 86% (12/14) and 100% (5/5) protection against 10(6) CFU Y. pestis of challenge, respectively. The immunized mice, guinea pigs and rabbits with EV76 vaccine gave 100% (6/6), 93% (13/14) and 100% (6/6) protection against 10(6) CFU Y. pestis of challenge respectively.

CONCLUSION

BALB/c mice is the best small animal model for valuation of protective efficacy of plague subunit vaccine. The guinea pigs showed a high individual variation for this purpose. The rabbits can be used as an alternative model for evaluating plague subunit vaccine.

摘要

目的

为评估鼠疫亚单位疫苗的保护效力,本研究选用了BALB/c小鼠、豚鼠和兔子。

方法

将小鼠(每组10只)、豚鼠(每组14只)和兔子(每组6只)分别通过肌肉注射途径用F1+rV270疫苗、EV76疫苗和明矾佐剂进行免疫。采用ELISA法测定小鼠、豚鼠和兔子的血清抗体滴度,并在初次免疫后第8周用10⁶CFU的鼠疫杆菌141菌株对免疫动物进行攻毒。

结果

用亚单位疫苗免疫的小鼠、豚鼠或兔子产生的抗F1 IgG滴度分别为41587.3±2.1、11543.7±2.1或522.4±22.4,它们之间的抗F1 IgG滴度差异具有统计学意义(F=17.58,P<0.01)。用亚单位疫苗免疫的小鼠、豚鼠或兔子的抗rV270 IgG滴度分别为15748.7±1.6、12.6±1.4或1648.0±5.0,它们之间的抗rV270 IgG滴度差异具有统计学意义(F值为16.34,P<0.01)。用EV76疫苗免疫的小鼠、豚鼠和兔子产生的抗F1 IgG滴度分别为913.4±4.5、937.0±2.0或342.0±12.0,它们之间的抗F1 IgG滴度差异具有统计学意义(F=23.67,P<0.01),而用EV76疫苗免疫的小鼠、豚鼠和兔子产生的抗rV270 IgG滴度分别为12.0±1.0、447.0±10.0、40.0±11.0,它们之间的抗rV270 IgG滴度无差异(F=2.20,P=0.1314)。用亚单位疫苗免疫的小鼠产生的抗F1 IgG滴度显著高于免疫的豚鼠和兔子(q值分别为30.57和19.04,P<0.01),免疫的豚鼠和兔子之间的抗F1 IgG滴度无差异(q=0.04,P=0.8485)。用亚单位疫苗免疫的小鼠产生的抗rV270 IgG滴度显著高于免疫的豚鼠和兔子(q值分别为27.10和19.49,P<0.01),用亚单位疫苗免疫的豚鼠和兔子之间的抗rV270 IgG滴度无差异(q=0.25,P=0.6187)。用EV76免疫的小鼠产生的抗F1 IgG滴度高于免疫的豚鼠和兔子(q值分别为40.67和29.10,P<0.01),而免疫的豚鼠和兔子之间的F1 IgG滴度无差异(q=0.06,P=0.8098)。用亚单位疫苗免疫的小鼠、豚鼠和兔子对10⁶CFU鼠疫杆菌攻毒的保护率分别为100%(10/10)、86%(12/14)和100%(5/5)。用EV76疫苗免疫的小鼠、豚鼠和兔子对10⁶CFU鼠疫杆菌攻毒的保护率分别为100%(6/6)、93%(13/14)和100%(6/6)。

结论

BALB/c小鼠是评估鼠疫亚单位疫苗保护效力的最佳小动物模型。豚鼠在此方面个体差异较大。兔子可作为评估鼠疫亚单位疫苗的替代模型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验