Allen Philip A, Ruthruff Eric, Elicker Joelle D, Lien Mei-Ching
Department of Psychology, University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325-4301, USA.
Exp Aging Res. 2009 Oct;35(4):369-99. doi: 10.1080/03610730903175766.
The authors tested 18 younger adults and 18 older adults on four sessions in a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, to see whether older adults can benefit as much from dual-task practice as younger adults. Task 1 involved tone discrimination and Task 2 involved simultaneous letter-matching. The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the tasks was either 50, 150, 300, or 900 ms. Although older adults showed a larger PRP effect than younger adults, there were no group differences in the practice/training benefit. These results differ from Maquestiaux, Hartley, and Bertsch (2004, Psychology and Aging, 19, 649-667, Experiment 1), who found that age differences in PRP effects became progressively larger with increased practice. These findings, along with the simultaneous-presentation, dual-task work of Kramer, Larish, and Strayer (1995, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 50-76) and Bherer et al. (2005, Psychology and Aging, 20, 695-709; 2006, Acta Psychologica, 123, 261-278), suggest that older adults can benefit as much as younger adults from dual-task training.
作者在心理不应期(PRP)范式下对18名年轻成年人和18名年长成年人进行了四个阶段的测试,以探究年长成年人是否能像年轻成年人一样从双重任务练习中获得同样多的益处。任务1是音调辨别,任务2是同时进行字母匹配。两项任务之间的刺激呈现间隔(SOA)为50、150、300或900毫秒。尽管年长成年人比年轻成年人表现出更大的PRP效应,但在练习/训练益处方面不存在组间差异。这些结果与马凯斯蒂奥、哈特利和贝奇(2004年,《心理学与衰老》,第19卷,第649 - 667页,实验1)的研究不同,他们发现随着练习增加,PRP效应的年龄差异会逐渐增大。这些发现,连同克莱默、拉里什和斯特雷耶(1995年,《实验心理学杂志:应用》,第1卷,第50 - 76页)以及贝雷尔等人(2005年,《心理学与衰老》,第20卷,第695 - 709页;2006年,《心理学学报》,第123卷,第261 - 278页)的同时呈现双重任务研究表明,年长成年人在双重任务训练中能和年轻成年人获得同样多的益处。