Suppr超能文献

[甲基强的松龙在脊髓损伤急性期的有效性——随机对照试验的系统评价]

[Effectiveness of methylprednisolone in the acute phase of spinal cord injuries--a systematic review of randomized controlled trials].

作者信息

Botelho Ricardo Vieira, Daniel Jefferson Walter, Boulosa José Luis Romeo, Colli Benedicto Oscar, Farias Ronald de Lucena, Moraes Osmar José Santos, Pimenta Wilson Eloy, Ribeiro Carlos Henrique, Ribeiro Francisco Ricardo Borges, Taricco Mario Augusto, Carvalho Marcio Vinhal de, Bernardo Wanderley Marques

机构信息

Programa de pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, IAMSPE.

出版信息

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2009 Nov-Dec;55(6):729-37. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302009000600019.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Steroid therapy has been tested as a protector in spinal cord injury. Multicenter studies evaluating the methylprednisolone (MP) in post traumatic neurological recovery have shown promising results according to NASCIS. A large number of critical studies related to the NASCIS results have been published.

OBJECTIVE

To review literature related to use of methylprednisolone compared with placebo.

METHODS

This analysis added the average improvement achieved in groups of patients who used MP and placebo (PL) to the average scores of groups at baseline, before treatment, resulting in the final neurological outcome for both groups.

RESULTS

The motor score of the MP group was only 2.5 points higher than the PL in a one year follow-up. In neurologically intact patients, the total score is 70 points. Improvement in sensitive scores was also discrete (1.1 and 1.7 points for the pinprick and light touch respectively). A high rate of complications was observed in a group of patients about 60 years old who used MP.

CONCLUSION

Differences in the clinical magnitude of benefit obtained (not confirmed by other studies) with the use of MP or PL are not significant, in comparison with the potential for complications when using methylprednisolone.

摘要

未标注

类固醇疗法已被作为脊髓损伤的一种保护措施进行测试。根据美国国立急性脊髓损伤研究(NASCIS),评估甲基强的松龙(MP)在创伤后神经功能恢复中的多中心研究已显示出有前景的结果。大量与NASCIS结果相关的批判性研究已发表。

目的

回顾与使用甲基强的松龙相比安慰剂的相关文献。

方法

该分析将使用MP和安慰剂(PL)的患者组所取得的平均改善值加到治疗前基线时两组的平均分数上,得出两组最终的神经学结果。

结果

在一年的随访中,MP组的运动评分仅比PL组高2.5分。在神经功能完整的患者中,总分是70分。感觉评分的改善也不明显(针刺觉和轻触觉分别为1.1分和1.7分)。在一组使用MP的60岁左右患者中观察到高并发症发生率。

结论

与使用甲基强的松龙时出现并发症的可能性相比,使用MP或PL所获得的临床益处程度差异(未得到其他研究证实)并不显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验