Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, 3333 Burnet Ave., MLC 2015, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):790-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902014.
Childhood absence epilepsy, the most common pediatric epilepsy syndrome, is usually treated with ethosuximide, valproic acid, or lamotrigine. The most efficacious and tolerable initial empirical treatment has not been defined.
In a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we compared the efficacy, tolerability, and neuropsychological effects of ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine in children with newly diagnosed childhood absence epilepsy. Drug doses were incrementally increased until the child was free of seizures, the maximal allowable or highest tolerable dose was reached, or a criterion indicating treatment failure was met. The primary outcome was freedom from treatment failure after 16 weeks of therapy; the secondary outcome was attentional dysfunction. Differential drug effects were determined by means of pairwise comparisons.
The 453 children who were randomly assigned to treatment with ethosuximide (156), lamotrigine (149), or valproic acid (148) were similar with respect to their demographic characteristics. After 16 weeks of therapy, the freedom-from-failure rates for ethosuximide and valproic acid were similar (53% and 58%, respectively; odds ratio with valproic acid vs. ethosuximide, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.98; P=0.35) and were higher than the rate for lamotrigine (29%; odds ratio with ethosuximide vs. lamotrigine, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.65 to 4.28; odds ratio with valproic acid vs. lamotrigine, 3.34; 95% CI, 2.06 to 5.42; P<0.001 for both comparisons). There were no significant differences among the three drugs with regard to discontinuation because of adverse events. Attentional dysfunction was more common with valproic acid than with ethosuximide (in 49% of the children vs. 33%; odds ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.41; P=0.03).
Ethosuximide and valproic acid are more effective than lamotrigine in the treatment of childhood absence epilepsy. Ethosuximide is associated with fewer adverse attentional effects. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00088452.)
儿童失神癫痫是最常见的儿童癫痫综合征,通常用乙琥胺、丙戊酸或拉莫三嗪治疗。尚未明确最有效且最耐受的初始经验性治疗方法。
在一项双盲、随机、对照临床试验中,我们比较了新诊断为儿童失神癫痫的儿童使用乙琥胺、丙戊酸和拉莫三嗪的疗效、耐受性和神经心理学影响。逐渐增加药物剂量,直到患儿无癫痫发作、达到最大允许剂量或最高耐受剂量,或达到治疗失败的标准。主要终点是治疗 16 周后无治疗失败;次要终点是注意力功能障碍。通过两两比较确定药物的差异作用。
453 名被随机分配至乙琥胺(156 名)、拉莫三嗪(149 名)或丙戊酸(148 名)治疗的患儿在人口统计学特征方面相似。经过 16 周的治疗,乙琥胺和丙戊酸的无失败率相似(分别为 53%和 58%;丙戊酸与乙琥胺的比值比为 1.26;95%置信区间[CI]为 0.80 至 1.98;P=0.35),高于拉莫三嗪(29%;乙琥胺与拉莫三嗪的比值比为 2.66;95%CI 为 1.65 至 4.28;丙戊酸与拉莫三嗪的比值比为 3.34;95%CI 为 2.06 至 5.42;两者均 P<0.001)。三种药物因不良事件而停药的发生率无显著差异。丙戊酸导致的注意力功能障碍比乙琥胺更常见(分别为 49%和 33%;比值比为 1.95;95%CI 为 1.12 至 3.41;P=0.03)。
乙琥胺和丙戊酸治疗儿童失神癫痫比拉莫三嗪更有效。乙琥胺引起不良注意力影响的风险较低。(ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT00088452)