National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James's Hospital, James's Street, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(4):307-22. doi: 10.2165/11318790-000000000-00000.
To describe the pharmacoeconomic assessment process in Ireland and to provide examples of recent appraisals and the subsequent impact on pricing and reimbursement decisions. The pharmacoeconomic appraisals conducted by the National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics (NCPE) between September 2006 and February 2009 were reviewed. The NCPE recommendations and subsequent reimbursement decisions by the Health Service Executive (HSE) were recorded. Recommendations made by the NCPE were compared with those of UK agencies. The duration of the NCPE pharmacoeconomic process and the time from marketing authorization to reimbursement was estimated. The budget impact assessments from the pharmaceutical companies were reviewed and compared for consistency. The NCPE conducted 12 single technology appraisals during the study period. Eight of the medicines assessed were either recommended as a cost-effective use of resources or recommended with certain restrictions, and were funded by the HSE. Of the four medicines that were not considered cost effective, two were reimbursed after a price reduction was negotiated and the remaining two were not. The NCPE recommendations concurred with those of the UK agencies for the majority of appraisals, with the exception of sunitinib and lapatinib. The average duration of the NCPE process was 2.7 months. The average time from marketing authorization to reimbursement was 7 months. The review of budget impact assessments highlighted a high degree of variability between submissions. The findings of this review highlight the efficiency of the pharmacoeconomic process and the acceptance of the NCPE recommendations by the HSE for pricing and reimbursement decisions. NCPE recommendations broadly concurred with those of UK agencies for the majority of appraisals.
描述爱尔兰的药物经济学评估流程,并提供最近评估的实例及其对定价和报销决策的后续影响。审查了国家药物经济学中心(NCPE)在 2006 年 9 月至 2009 年 2 月期间进行的药物经济学评估。记录了 NCPE 的建议和随后由卫生服务行政署(HSE)做出的报销决定。比较了 NCPE 的建议与英国机构的建议。估计了 NCPE 药物经济学流程的持续时间以及从上市许可到报销的时间。审查了制药公司的预算影响评估并对其进行了一致性比较。在研究期间,NCPE 进行了 12 项单一技术评估。评估的 8 种药物被认为是资源的有效利用或具有某些限制的建议,并由 HSE 资助。在被认为没有经济效益的 4 种药物中,有 2 种经过谈判降低价格后得到报销,其余 2 种未报销。除舒尼替尼和拉帕替尼外,NCPE 的建议与英国机构的评估结果大部分一致。NCPE 流程的平均持续时间为 2.7 个月。从上市许可到报销的平均时间为 7 个月。预算影响评估的审查突出了提交之间存在很大的可变性。该审查结果强调了药物经济学流程的效率以及 HSE 对定价和报销决策对 NCPE 建议的接受程度。NCPE 的建议与英国机构的评估结果大部分一致。