Kyoto University Health Service, Kyoto, Japan.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):994-1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906644.
It is unclear whether dissemination of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in public places can improve the rate of survival among patients who have had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
From January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2007, we conducted a prospective, population-based, observational study involving consecutive patients across Japan who had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and in whom resuscitation was attempted by emergency responders. We evaluated the effect of nationwide dissemination of public-access AEDs on the rate of survival after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The primary outcome measure was the 1-month rate of survival with minimal neurologic impairment. A multivariate logistic-regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with a good neurologic outcome.
A total of 312,319 adults who had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were included in the study; 12,631 of these patients had ventricular fibrillation and had an arrest that was of cardiac origin and that was witnessed by bystanders. In 462 of these patients (3.7%), shocks were administered by laypersons with the use of public-access AEDs, and the proportion increased, from 1.2% to 6.2%, as the number of public-access AEDs increased (P<0.001 for trend). Among all patients who had a bystander-witnessed arrest of cardiac origin and who had ventricular fibrillation, 14.4% were alive at 1 month with minimal neurologic impairment; among patients who received shocks from public-access AEDs, 31.6% were alive at 1 month with minimal neurologic impairment. Early defibrillation, regardless of the type of provider (bystander or emergency-medical-services personnel), was associated with a good neurologic outcome after a cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation (adjusted odds ratio per 1-minute increase in the time to administration of shock, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 0.92; P<0.001). The mean time to shock was reduced from 3.7 to 2.2 minutes, and the annual number of patients per 10 million population who survived with minimal neurologic impairment increased from 2.4 to 8.9 as the number of public-access AEDs increased from fewer than 1 per square kilometer of inhabited area to 4 or more.
Nationwide dissemination of public-access AEDs in Japan resulted in earlier administration of shocks by laypersons and in an increase in the 1-month rate of survival with minimal neurologic impairment after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
在公共场所普及自动体外除颤器(AED)是否能提高院外心搏骤停患者的存活率尚不清楚。
从 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2007 年 12 月 31 日,我们进行了一项前瞻性、基于人群的观察性研究,涉及日本各地的院外心搏骤停患者,这些患者的复苏由急救人员进行。我们评估了全国范围内普及公众可获取 AED 对院外心搏骤停后存活率的影响。主要观察指标为 1 个月时最小神经功能损伤的存活率。采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估与良好神经功能结局相关的因素。
共有 312319 名成年人发生院外心搏骤停,其中 12631 例患者有心室颤动,且心搏骤停起源于心脏,并由旁观者目击。在这 462 例患者中(3.7%),非专业人员使用公众可获取 AED 进行电击,且随着公众可获取 AED 数量的增加,这一比例从 1.2%增加到 6.2%(趋势 P<0.001)。在所有有旁观者目击的起源于心脏的心搏骤停且有心室颤动的患者中,14.4%在 1 个月时最小神经功能损伤存活;接受公众可获取 AED 电击的患者中,31.6%在 1 个月时最小神经功能损伤存活。早期除颤,无论提供者类型(旁观者还是急救医疗服务人员)如何,均与室颤性心搏骤停后的良好神经功能结局相关(每延迟 1 分钟给予电击的优势比为 0.91;95%置信区间为 0.89 至 0.92;P<0.001)。电击时间从 3.7 分钟缩短至 2.2 分钟,随着每平方公里居住面积公众可获取 AED 数量从不足 1 台增加到 4 台或更多,每 1000 万人口中存活且最小神经功能损伤的患者人数从每年 2.4 人增加到 8.9 人。
日本在全国范围内普及公众可获取 AED 导致非专业人员更早进行电击,并增加了院外心搏骤停后 1 个月时最小神经功能损伤的存活率。