Salinas Rodrigo A, Alvarez Gonzalo, Daly Fergus, Ferreira Joaquim
Department of Neurological Sciences, Universidad de Chile, Av. Salvador 364, Santiago, Chile, 7500922.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD001942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001942.pub4.
Inflammation and oedema of the facial nerve are implicated in causing Bell's palsy. Corticosteroids have a potent anti-inflammatory action which should minimise nerve damage.
The objective of this review was to assess the effect of corticosteroid therapy in Bell's palsy.
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Specialized Register (9 December 2008) for randomised trials, as well as MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 2008), EMBASE (January 1980 to December 2008) and LILACS (9 December 2008). We contacted known experts in the field to identify additional published or unpublished trials.
Randomised trials comparing different routes of administration and dosage schemes of corticosteroid or adrenocorticotrophic hormone therapy versus a control group where no therapy considered effective for this condition was administered, unless it was also given in a similar way to the experimental group.
Two authors independently assessed eligibility, trial quality, and extracted the data.
Eight trials with a total of 1569 participants were included. Allocation concealment was appropriate in six trials, and the data reported allowed an intention-to-treat analysis in four, while unpublished data from the fifth and sixth trials were provided by the authors. The data included in the main outcome of this meta-analysis were collected from seven trials with a total of 1507 participants. Overall 175/754 (23%) of the participants allocated to corticosteroids had incomplete recovery of facial motor function six months or more after randomisation, significantly less than 245/753 (33%) in the control group (risk ratio (RR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61 to 0.83). There was, also, a significant reduction in motor synkinesis during follow-up in those receiving corticosteroids (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.81). The reduction in the proportion of patients with cosmetically disabling sequelae six months after randomisation, however, was not significant (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.15). The trial not included in the primary outcome of this meta-analysis showed a non-significant difference in outcomes between the arms.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence from randomised controlled trials shows significant benefit from treating Bell's palsy with corticosteroids.
面神经的炎症和水肿与贝尔麻痹的发病有关。皮质类固醇具有强大的抗炎作用,应能将神经损伤降至最低。
本综述的目的是评估皮质类固醇疗法对贝尔麻痹的疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane神经肌肉疾病组试验专门注册库(2008年12月9日)以查找随机试验,以及MEDLINE(1966年1月至2008年12月)、EMBASE(1980年1月至2008年12月)和LILACS(2008年12月9日)。我们联系了该领域的知名专家以确定其他已发表或未发表的试验。
比较皮质类固醇或促肾上腺皮质激素疗法不同给药途径和剂量方案与未给予任何被认为对该病症有效的治疗的对照组的随机试验,除非该治疗也以与实验组类似的方式给予。
两位作者独立评估入选资格、试验质量并提取数据。
纳入了八项试验,共1569名参与者。六项试验的分配隐藏适当,四项试验报告的数据允许进行意向性分析,而第五项和第六项试验的未发表数据由作者提供。本荟萃分析主要结果中纳入的数据来自七项试验,共1507名参与者。总体而言,随机分组后六个月或更长时间,分配接受皮质类固醇治疗的参与者中有175/754(23%)面部运动功能未完全恢复,显著低于对照组的245/753(33%)(风险比(RR)0.71,95%置信区间(CI)0.61至0.83)。接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者在随访期间运动联带运动也有显著减少(RR 0.6,95% CI 0.44至0.81)。然而,随机分组六个月后美容致残后遗症患者比例的降低并不显著(RR 0.97,95% CI 0.44至2.15)。本荟萃分析主要结果未纳入的试验显示两组之间的结果无显著差异。
随机对照试验的现有证据表明,用皮质类固醇治疗贝尔麻痹有显著益处。