Suppr超能文献

七氟醚和全静脉麻醉的苏醒时间相似:一项择期幕上开颅手术患者多中心 RCT 的结果。

Emergence times are similar with sevoflurane and total intravenous anesthesia: results of a multicenter RCT of patients scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy.

机构信息

Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit I, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico, Bari, Italy.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010 Apr;22(2):110-8. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181c959da.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nearly every anesthetic agent has been used for craniotomy, yet the choice between intravenous or volatile agents has been considered an area of significant debate in neuroanesthesia. We designed a Randomized Clinical Trial to test the hypothesis that inhalation anesthesia (sevoflurane/remifentanil--group S) reduces emergence time by 5 minutes compared with intravenous anesthesia (propofol/remifentanil--group P) in patients undergoing neurosurgery for supratentorial neoplasms.

METHODS

Adult ASA I-III elective patients were randomly assigned to group S or P. The primary outcome was time to reach an Aldrete test score (AS) of more than equal to 9; secondary outcomes were times to eyes opening (TEO) and extubation (ET), adverse events, intraoperative hemodynamics, brain relaxation score (BRS), opioid consumption, and diuresis.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between S (n=149) and P (n=153) treatments in primary outcomes: median time to reach AS=9 was 5 minutes (25th to 75th percentile 5 to 10 minutes in both groups, P > or = 0.05); and 15 minutes to reach AS=10 (P group 95% CI=10.3-19.7 min; S group 95% CI=11.4-18.5 min, P > or = 0.05) in both groups. TEO and ET expressed as median values (95% CI) were, respectively: 8 (6.8 to 9.2) minutes in group P versus 6 (4.6 to 7.4) in group S, P < 0.05; 10 (9.6 to 10.4) minutes in group P versus 8 (7 to 9) in group S, P < 0.05. Shivering, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain, and seizure during the first 3 postoperative hours were not significantly different between the 2 groups, nor was BRS. Hypotension was more frequent in group S. Intraoperative diuresis and opioid consumption were greater in group P.

CONCLUSIONS

Sevoflurane/remifentanil neuroanesthesia is not superior to propofol/remifentanil in time to reach an AS > or = 9.

摘要

背景

几乎每种麻醉剂都曾用于开颅术,但在神经麻醉学中,静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉之间的选择一直是一个备受争议的领域。我们设计了一项随机临床试验,以检验以下假设,即在接受幕上肿瘤神经外科手术的患者中,与静脉麻醉(丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼-组 P)相比,吸入麻醉(七氟醚/瑞芬太尼-组 S)可将苏醒时间缩短 5 分钟。

方法

选择美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级 I-III 的择期患者,随机分配至组 S 或 P。主要结局是达到 Aldrete 测试评分(AS)≥9 的时间;次要结局是睁眼时间(TEO)和拔管时间(ET)、不良事件、术中血流动力学、脑松弛评分(BRS)、阿片类药物消耗和尿量。

结果

在主要结局方面,S 组(n=149)和 P 组(n=153)治疗之间未发现显著差异:达到 AS=9 的中位数时间为 5 分钟(两组的 25 至 75 百分位数均为 5 至 10 分钟,P≥0.05);达到 AS=10 的中位数时间为 15 分钟(P 组 95%CI=10.3-19.7min;S 组 95%CI=11.4-18.5min,P≥0.05)。以中位数(95%CI)表示的 TEO 和 ET 分别为:P 组 8(6.8 至 9.2)分钟,S 组 6(4.6 至 7.4)分钟,P<0.05;P 组 10(9.6 至 10.4)分钟,S 组 8(7 至 9)分钟,P<0.05。在术后 3 小时内,两组之间的寒战、术后恶心和呕吐、疼痛和癫痫发作无显著差异,BRS 也无差异。S 组低血压更常见。P 组术中尿量和阿片类药物消耗更大。

结论

七氟醚/瑞芬太尼神经麻醉在达到 AS≥9 的时间上并不优于丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验