Suppr超能文献

桑格测序、焦磷酸测序和熔解曲线分析在 KRAS 基因突变检测中的比较:诊断和临床意义。

Comparison of Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and melting curve analysis for the detection of KRAS mutations: diagnostic and clinical implications.

机构信息

The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Department of Pathology, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Park SB202, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

J Mol Diagn. 2010 Jul;12(4):425-32. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090188. Epub 2010 Apr 29.

Abstract

Mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS oncogene are relatively common in colorectal and lung adenocarcinomas. Recent data indicate that these mutations result in resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. Therefore, we assessed Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and melting curve analysis for the detection of KRAS codon 12/13 mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, including 58 primary and 42 metastatic colorectal adenocarcinomas, 63 primary and 17 metastatic lung adenocarcinomas, and 20 normal colon samples. Of 180 tumor samples, 62.2% were KRAS mutant positive, and 37.8% were negative. Melting curve analysis yielded no false positive or false negative results, but had 10% equivocal calls. Melting curve analysis also resulted in 4 cases with melting curves inconsistent with either wild-type or codon 12/13 mutations. These patterns were generated from samples with double mutants in codons 12/13 and with mutations outside of codons 12/13. Pyrosequencing yielded no false positive or false negative results as well. However, two samples from one patient yielded a pyrogram that was flagged as abnormal, but the mutation subtype could not be determined. Finally, using an electronic cutoff of 10%, Sanger sequencing showed 11.1% false positives and 6.1% false negatives. In our hands, the limit of detection for Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and melting curve analysis was approximately 15 to 20%, 5%, and 10% mutant alleles, respectively.

摘要

KRAS 癌基因密码子 12 和 13 中的突变在结直肠癌和肺腺癌中相对常见。最近的数据表明,这些突变导致对表皮生长因子受体治疗的耐药性。因此,我们评估了 Sanger 测序、焦磷酸测序和熔解曲线分析在福尔马林固定石蜡包埋样本中检测 KRAS 密码子 12/13 突变的效果,包括 58 例原发性和 42 例转移性结直肠腺癌、63 例原发性和 17 例转移性肺腺癌以及 20 例正常结肠样本。在 180 个肿瘤样本中,62.2%为 KRAS 突变阳性,37.8%为阴性。熔解曲线分析没有产生假阳性或假阴性结果,但有 10%的结果模棱两可。熔解曲线分析还导致 4 个病例的熔解曲线与野生型或密码子 12/13 突变不一致。这些模式是由密码子 12/13 中的双突变和密码子 12/13 之外的突变产生的。焦磷酸测序也没有产生假阳性或假阴性结果。然而,来自一位患者的两个样本产生了一个被标记为异常的焦磷酸图,但无法确定突变亚型。最后,使用 10%的电子截断值,Sanger 测序显示有 11.1%的假阳性和 6.1%的假阴性。在我们的研究中,Sanger 测序、焦磷酸测序和熔解曲线分析的检测下限分别约为 15%至 20%、5%和 10%的突变等位基因。

相似文献

4
Comparative analysis of pyrosequencing and QMC-PCR in conjunction with high resolution melting for KRAS/BRAF mutation detection.
Int J Exp Pathol. 2010 Dec;91(6):500-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2010.00733.x. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
5
Comparative analysis of dideoxy sequencing, the KRAS StripAssay and pyrosequencing for detection of KRAS mutation.
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct 14;16(38):4858-64. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i38.4858.
6
7
A multiplex SNaPshot assay as a rapid method for detecting KRAS and BRAF mutations in advanced colorectal cancers.
J Mol Diagn. 2011 Sep;13(5):485-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
10
Detection of KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations by mutant-enriched PCR assay.
Clin Chim Acta. 2014 Sep 25;436:169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive benchmarking of genome editing quantification methods for plant applications.
iScience. 2025 Apr 29;28(6):112350. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112350. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
2
4
Mosaic Form of von Hippel-Lindau Syndrome: Case Report and Literature Review.
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 19;26(6):2751. doi: 10.3390/ijms26062751.
7
An Optimized CRISPR/Cas12a Assay to Facilitate the BRAF V600E Mutation Detection.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2024 Nov;38(21):e25101. doi: 10.1002/jcla.25101. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
8
KRAS mutations detection methodology: from RFLP to CRISPR/Cas based methods.
Funct Integr Genomics. 2024 Oct 5;24(5):183. doi: 10.1007/s10142-024-01421-z.

本文引用的文献

2
Pyrosequencing method to detect KRAS mutation in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissues.
Anal Biochem. 2009 Aug 15;391(2):166-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.05.027. Epub 2009 May 21.
3
High sensitivity of both sequencing and real-time PCR analysis of KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer tissue.
J Cell Mol Med. 2010 Aug;14(8):2122-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00788.x. Epub 2010 May 13.
5
K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 23;359(17):1757-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804385.
8
Sensitive sequencing method for KRAS mutation detection by Pyrosequencing.
J Mol Diagn. 2005 Aug;7(3):413-21. doi: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60571-5.
9
Genome signatures of colon carcinoma cell lines.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2004 Dec;155(2):119-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2004.03.014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验