Suppr超能文献

果实中的信号趋同:是被食果动物选择的结果吗?

Signal convergence in fruits: a result of selection by frugivores?

机构信息

Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-8525, USA.

出版信息

J Evol Biol. 2010 Mar;23(3):614-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01931.x.

Abstract

The Dispersal Syndrome hypothesis remains contentious, stating that apparently nonrandom associations of fruit characteristics result from selection by seed dispersers. We examine a key assumption under this hypothesis, i.e. that fruit traits can be used as reliable signals by frugivores. We first test this assumption by looking at whether fruit colour allows birds and primates to distinguish between fruits commonly dispersed by birds or primates. Second, we test whether the colours of fruits dispersed by primates are more contrasting to primates than the colours of bird-dispersed fruits, expected if fruit colour is an adaptation to facilitate the detection by seed dispersers. Third, we test whether fruit colour has converged in unrelated plant species dispersed by similar frugivores. We use vision models based on peak sensitivities of birds' and primates' cone cells. We base our analyses on the visual systems of two types of birds (violet and ultraviolet based) and three types of primates (trichromatic primates from the Old and the New Worlds, and a dichromatic New World monkey). Using a Discriminant Function Analysis, we find that all frugivore groups can reliably discriminate between bird- and primate-dispersed fruits. Fruit colour can be a reliable signal to different seed dispersers. However, the colours of primate-dispersed fruits are less contrasting to primates than those of bird-dispersed fruits. Fruit colour convergence in unrelated plants is independent of phylogeny and can be better explained by disperser type, which supports the hypothesis that frugivores are important in fruit evolution. We discuss adaptive and nonadaptive hypotheses that can potentially explain the pattern we found.

摘要

扩散综合征假说仍然存在争议,该假说认为,果实特征的明显非随机关联是由种子散布者选择的结果。我们检验了该假说的一个关键假设,即果实特征可以被食果者用作可靠的信号。我们首先通过观察鸟类和灵长类动物是否可以通过果实颜色来区分通常由鸟类或灵长类动物传播的果实,来检验这一假设。其次,我们测试了灵长类动物传播的果实颜色与鸟类传播的果实颜色相比,是否对灵长类动物更具对比度,如果果实颜色是一种适应机制,以促进种子散布者的检测,那么这种情况是可以预期的。第三,我们测试了由类似食果者传播的不同植物物种的果实颜色是否趋同。我们使用基于鸟类和灵长类动物视锥细胞峰值敏感度的视觉模型。我们的分析基于两种类型鸟类(基于紫光和紫外线)和三种类型灵长类动物(来自旧大陆和新大陆的三色灵长类动物,以及新大陆的二色性灵长类动物)的视觉系统。使用判别函数分析,我们发现所有食果者群体都可以可靠地区分鸟类和灵长类动物传播的果实。果实颜色可以成为不同种子散布者的可靠信号。然而,灵长类动物传播的果实颜色与灵长类动物相比,对比度较小。在无亲缘关系的植物中,果实颜色趋同与系统发育无关,而可以更好地用散布者类型来解释,这支持了食果者在果实进化中具有重要作用的假说。我们讨论了潜在的适应性和非适应性假说,这些假说可以解释我们发现的模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验