Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Ave, Suite 800, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9.
Can J Public Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S46-52. doi: 10.1007/BF03403846.
In Canada, many datasets are initially collected for purposes other than occupational health and safety (OHS) research. These include administrative health care billing records, pharmaceutical records, vital statistics, provincial cancer registries and workers' compensation claims data. In addition, many national and provincial health surveys, while not focused specifically on occupational health and safety, collect data on the health status and health determinants of populations, and such data can be used for investigating OHS issues among Canadian workers. This paper provides examples of the use of administrative and survey data for OHS research projects from the provinces of Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia to illustrate the potential of such data. These three provinces have a long history of using administrative and survey data for OHS research and have developed capacity in this regard for improving access to data, for linkage of records across databases and for developing methods to answer OHS questions. As research using these data sources expands, a consistent understanding within the work and health research community must be forged concerning the strengths and limitations of these data resources and their comparability.
在加拿大,许多数据集最初是为了职业健康和安全(OHS)研究以外的目的而收集的。这些数据集包括行政医疗保健计费记录、药品记录、生命统计数据、省级癌症登记处和工人赔偿索赔数据。此外,许多国家和省级健康调查虽然不是专门针对职业健康和安全,但收集了有关人群健康状况和健康决定因素的数据,这些数据可用于调查加拿大工人的 OHS 问题。本文提供了来自魁北克省、安大略省和不列颠哥伦比亚省的职业健康和安全研究项目中使用行政和调查数据的示例,以说明此类数据的潜力。这三个省份在使用行政和调查数据进行职业健康和安全研究方面有着悠久的历史,并在这方面建立了能力,以改善数据的获取、数据库之间记录的链接以及开发回答 OHS 问题的方法。随着对这些数据源的研究不断扩大,必须在工作和健康研究界内部就这些数据资源的优势和局限性及其可比性达成一致的理解。