Suppr超能文献

血红蛋白 A₁C 测定在早期糖尿病状态诊断或筛查中的灵敏度不足。

Insufficient sensitivity of hemoglobin A(₁C) determination in diagnosis or screening of early diabetic states.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA.

出版信息

Metabolism. 2011 Jan;60(1):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.06.017. Epub 2010 Aug 17.

Abstract

An International Expert Committee made recommendations for using the hemoglobin A(₁C) (A1C) assay as the preferred method for the diagnosis of diabetes in nonpregnant individuals. A concentration of at least 6.5% was considered as diagnostic. It is the aim of this study to compare the sensitivity of A1C with that of plasma glucose concentrations in subjects with early diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). We chose 2 groups of subjects who had A1C not exceeding 6.4%. The first group of 89 subjects had family histories of diabetes (MODY or type 2 diabetes mellitus) and had oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and A1C determinations. They included 36 subjects with diabetes or IGT and 53 with normal OGTT. The second group of 58 subjects was screened for diabetes in our Diabetes Clinic by fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour plasma glucose, or OGTT and A1C; and similar comparisons were made. Subjects with diabetes or IGT, including those with fasting hyperglycemia, had A1C ranging from 5.0% to 6.4% (mean, 5.8%). The subjects with normal OGTT had A1C of 4.2% to 6.3% (mean, 5.4%), or 5.5% for the 2 groups. The A1C may be in the normal range in subjects with diabetes or IGT, including those with fasting hyperglycemia. Approximately one third of subjects with early diabetes and IGT have A1C less than 5.7%, the cut point that the American Diabetes Association recommends as indicating the onset of risk of developing diabetes in the future. The results of our study are similar to those obtained by a large Dutch epidemiologic study. If our aim is to recognize early diabetic states to apply effective prophylactic procedures to prevent or delay progression to more severe diabetes, A1C is not sufficiently sensitive or reliable for diagnosis of diabetes or IGT. A combination of A1C and plasma glucose determinations, where necessary, is recommended for diagnosis or screening of diabetes or IGT.

摘要

一个国际专家委员会建议将血红蛋白 A₁C(A1C)检测作为诊断非妊娠个体糖尿病的首选方法。浓度至少为 6.5%被认为是诊断标准。本研究旨在比较 A1C 与早期糖尿病或糖耐量受损(IGT)患者血浆葡萄糖浓度的敏感性。我们选择了两组 A1C 不超过 6.4%的受试者。第一组 89 名受试者有糖尿病家族史(MODY 或 2 型糖尿病),进行了口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)和 A1C 测定。其中 36 名受试者患有糖尿病或 IGT,53 名受试者 OGTT 正常。第二组 58 名受试者在我们的糖尿病诊所通过空腹血糖、2 小时血糖或 OGTT 和 A1C 进行糖尿病筛查,并进行了类似的比较。包括空腹高血糖在内的糖尿病或 IGT 患者的 A1C 范围为 5.0%至 6.4%(平均 5.8%)。OGTT 正常的受试者的 A1C 为 4.2%至 6.3%(平均 5.4%),两组的平均值为 5.5%。糖尿病或 IGT 患者,包括空腹高血糖患者,A1C 可能在正常范围内。大约三分之一的早期糖尿病和 IGT 患者的 A1C 低于 5.7%,这是美国糖尿病协会建议的表明未来发生糖尿病风险的切点。我们的研究结果与一项大型荷兰流行病学研究相似。如果我们的目的是识别早期糖尿病状态,采取有效的预防措施来预防或延缓向更严重的糖尿病进展,那么 A1C 对于诊断糖尿病或 IGT 不够敏感或可靠。建议在必要时结合 A1C 和血浆葡萄糖测定进行糖尿病或 IGT 的诊断或筛查。

相似文献

1
Insufficient sensitivity of hemoglobin A(₁C) determination in diagnosis or screening of early diabetic states.
Metabolism. 2011 Jan;60(1):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.06.017. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
2
Combined use of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin A1c in the screening of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance.
Acta Diabetol. 2010 Sep;47(3):231-6. doi: 10.1007/s00592-009-0143-2. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
4
Screening for Turner Syndrome-Associated Hyperglycemia: Evaluating Hemoglobin A1c and Fasting Blood Glucose.
Horm Res Paediatr. 2024;97(4):374-382. doi: 10.1159/000534371. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
5
Report of the Committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002 Jan;55(1):65-85. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(01)00365-5.
8
Screening markers of impaired glucose tolerance in the obese pediatric population.
Horm Res Paediatr. 2010;73(2):102-7. doi: 10.1159/000277625. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
9
The relative merits of haemoglobin A1c and fasting plasma glucose as first-line diagnostic tests for diabetes mellitus in non-pregnant subjects.
Diabet Med. 1998 Jul;15(7):558-63. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:7<558::AID-DIA669>3.0.CO;2-Q.

引用本文的文献

1
Momordica balsamina improves glucose handling in a diet-induced prediabetic rat model.
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 14;18(12):e0295498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295498. eCollection 2023.
2
The Role of Hemoglobin A1C in Diabetes Screening and Diabetic Retinopathy.
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 26;10(21):4947. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214947.
3
Role and Risk Factors of Glycosylated Hemoglobin Levels in Early Disease Screening.
J Diabetes Res. 2021 Apr 8;2021:6626587. doi: 10.1155/2021/6626587. eCollection 2021.
4
Predictive Performance of Glycated Hemoglobin for Incident Diabetes Compared with Glucose Tolerance Test According to Central Obesity.
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2020 Dec;35(4):873-881. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2020.798. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
5
Plasma glycemic measures and fecundability in a Singapore preconception cohort study.
Fertil Steril. 2021 Jan;115(1):138-147. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
6
Comparison of 2-Hour Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and Hemoglobin A1C in the Identification of Pre-Diabetes in Women with Infertility and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.
Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2019 Mar 22;13:1179558119831280. doi: 10.1177/1179558119831280. eCollection 2019.
10
Comparing glucose and hemoglobin A diagnostic tests among a high metabolic risk Hispanic population.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2017 May;33(4). doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2874. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Hemoglobin A1c: teaching a new dog old tricks.
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 15;152(12):815-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-12-201006150-00011.
2
Prevalence of diabetes and high risk for diabetes using A1C criteria in the U.S. population in 1988-2006.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):562-8. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1524. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
3
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011.
4
Moving to an A1C-based diagnosis of diabetes has a different impact on prevalence in different ethnic groups.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):580-2. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1843. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
6
A1C cut points to define various glucose intolerance groups in Asian Indians.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):515-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1694. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
7
Relationship between A1C and glucose levels in the general Dutch population: the new Hoorn study.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33(1):61-6. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0677. Epub 2009 Oct 6.
8
Counterpoint: Selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1352-4. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0361.
9
Point: Universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1349-51. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0188.
10
International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1327-34. doi: 10.2337/dc09-9033. Epub 2009 Jun 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验