ECT Oekotoxikologie, Flörsheim/Main, Germany.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2010 Oct;6(4):653-62. doi: 10.1002/ieam.92.
Current standard testing and assessment tools are not designed to identify specific and biologically highly sensitive modes of action of chemicals, such as endocrine disruption. This information, however, can be important to define the relevant endpoints for an assessment and to characterize thresholds of their sublethal, population-relevant effects. Starting a decade ago, compound-specific risk assessment procedures were amended by specifically addressing endocrine-disrupting properties of substances. In 2002, the Conceptual Framework, agreed upon by OECD's Task Force on Endocrine Disrupters Testing and Assessment, did not propose specific testing strategies, and appropriate testing methods had not yet been developed and approved. In the meantime, the OECD Test Guidelines Programme has undertaken important steps to revise established and to develop new test methods, which can be used to identify and quantify effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on mammals, birds, amphibians, fish, and invertebrates. For fish testing of endocrine-disrupting chemicals, the first Test Guidelines have recently been adopted by the OECD and validation of further test systems is under progress. Based on these test systems and the experience gained during their validation procedures, we propose a 3-step fish testing strategy: 1) Weight-of-evidence approach for identifying potential sexual endocrine-disrupting chemicals; even after advanced specification of systematic criteria, this step of establishing initial suspicion will still require expert judgment; 2) in vivo evaluation of sexual endocrine-disrupting activity in fish by applying in vivo fish screening assays; sufficient data are available to diagnose the aromatase-inhibition and estrogen-receptor agonist mechanisms of action by indicative endpoints (biomarkers), whereas the ability of the respective biomarkers in the screening assay to identify the estrogen-receptor antagonists and androgen-receptor agonists and antagonists requires further validation; 3) characterization of sexual endocrine-mediated adverse effects including threshold concentrations; in cases when the most sensitive population-relevant endpoints and the most sensitive time window for exposure are known for the mechanisms of action, the fish full life-cycle or 2-generation test, which are the normal definitive tests, might be abbreviated to, e.g., the fish sexual development test. In the European Union, the measurement of indicative endpoints in the definitive test might be crucial for the authorization procedure under REACH and plant-protection products. The results of the definitive tests can be used in existing schemes of compound-specific environmental risk assessments.
当前的标准测试和评估工具并非专门用于确定化学物质的特定和高度敏感的作用模式,例如内分泌干扰。然而,这些信息对于确定评估的相关终点以及描述其亚致死、对种群有影响的阈值非常重要。从十年前开始,具体化合物风险评估程序就开始特别针对物质的内分泌干扰特性进行修订。2002 年,经合组织内分泌干扰物测试和评估工作组同意的概念框架并未提出具体的测试策略,并且尚未开发和批准适当的测试方法。在此期间,经合组织测试指南方案已采取重要步骤来修订已建立的和开发新的测试方法,这些方法可用于识别和量化内分泌干扰化学物质对哺乳动物、鸟类、两栖动物、鱼类和无脊椎动物的影响。对于鱼类内分泌干扰化学物质的测试,经合组织最近通过了第一批测试指南,并且正在进行进一步测试系统的验证。基于这些测试系统以及在验证过程中获得的经验,我们提出了一个三步鱼类测试策略:1)通过证据权重方法识别潜在的性内分泌干扰化学物质;即使在系统标准的高级规范之后,建立初始怀疑的这一步仍将需要专家判断;2)通过应用体内鱼类筛选试验评估鱼类的性内分泌干扰活性;有足够的数据可用于通过指示终点(生物标志物)诊断芳香酶抑制和雌激素受体激动剂作用机制,而筛选试验中各自生物标志物识别雌激素受体拮抗剂和雄激素受体拮抗剂的能力需要进一步验证;3)描述性内分泌介导的不良影响,包括阈值浓度;在作用机制的情况下,已知最敏感的种群相关终点和最敏感的暴露时间窗口,鱼类全生命周期或两代测试,即正常的确定性测试,可能会缩短,例如鱼类性发育测试。在欧盟,在 REACH 和植物保护产品的授权程序中,在确定性测试中测量指示终点可能至关重要。确定性测试的结果可用于特定化合物的环境风险评估的现有方案中。