Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mansoura University, ElMansoura, Egypt.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Apr;268(4):541-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1401-1. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the benefits of intra-operative ultrasonic guidance in the management of isolated nasal bone fractures. A prospective, randomized, controlled, double blinded study was designed. Sixty-eight patients who had isolated fracture nose were treated by either a simple closed reduction or by ultrasound-guided reduction (34 patients each) with a follow up for an average of 4.5 and 5.5 months, respectively. Post-traumatic and post-reduction nasal profiles were compared (by blinded photographer), and patient's satisfaction was analyzed after reduction in both groups. We used Student's t test for independent groups to compare between the average patient's scores. The average patient's nasal profile score for closed reduction group was 2.31. Thirteen patients (40.6%) had scored 3, 16 (50%) had scored 2, and three (9.4%) patients had scored 1. The average patient's nasal profile score for ultrasonic assisted group was 2.72. Twenty-four patients (75%) had scored 3, 7 (22%) had scored 2, and one (3%) patient had scored 1. The average patient's satisfaction score for closed reduction was 2.62. Twenty-four patients (75%) had scored 3, 4 (12.5%) patients had scored 2, and 4 (12.5%) patients had scored 1. The average patient's satisfaction score for ultrasonic assisted group was 2.78. Twenty-six patients (81%) scored 3, 5 (16%) patients scored 2, and one (3%) patient scored 1. Patients undergoing ultrasonic nasal bone reduction scored significantly better nasal profile scores than patients undergoing simple closed reduction, on the other hand, patient satisfaction scores had no significant difference between both groups. Treating nasal bone fractures with the assistance of intra-operative ultrasound resulted in a significantly better nasal profile appearance, than treating it by simple closed reduction.
本研究旨在评估术中超声引导在单纯鼻骨骨折治疗中的优势。采用前瞻性、随机、对照、双盲研究设计。68 例单纯鼻骨骨折患者分别接受单纯闭合复位或超声引导下复位治疗(各 34 例),平均随访 4.5 个月和 5.5 个月。比较外伤后和复位后鼻侧位像,并分析两组患者复位后的满意度。采用独立样本 t 检验比较两组患者平均评分。闭合复位组患者鼻侧位评分平均为 2.31。13 例(40.6%)评分为 3,16 例(50%)评分为 2,3 例(9.4%)评分为 1。超声辅助复位组患者鼻侧位评分平均为 2.72。24 例(75%)评分为 3,7 例(22%)评分为 2,1 例(3%)评分为 1。闭合复位组患者满意度平均评分为 2.62。24 例(75%)评分为 3,4 例(12.5%)评分为 2,4 例(12.5%)评分为 1。超声辅助复位组患者满意度平均评分为 2.78。26 例(81%)评分为 3,5 例(16%)评分为 2,1 例(3%)评分为 1。行超声辅助鼻骨复位的患者鼻侧位评分明显优于单纯闭合复位,而两组患者满意度评分无显著差异。与单纯闭合复位相比,术中超声辅助治疗鼻骨骨折可显著改善鼻侧位外观。