Suppr超能文献

评估一种新型痰液清除技术——水动力疗法(HAT)在成人囊性纤维化患者中的应用:一项可行性研究。

Evaluation of a novel sputum clearance technique--hydro-acoustic therapy (HAT) in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a feasibility study.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol.

出版信息

Chron Respir Dis. 2010;7(4):217-27. doi: 10.1177/1479972310376082.

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the efficacy, safety and patients' acceptance of a novel system for sputum clearance--Hydro Acoustic Therapy (HAT) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). This is a prospective crossover study where 18 patients received 6 sessions of physiotherapy over 6 separate days. These consisted of 2 sessions of either HAT, flutter valve or and sitting in the bath with sounds without vibration (placebo) for 30 minutes each. The efficacy was investigated by measuring the weight of wet and dry sputum after each session and by change in spirometry values. The preference was assessed by a questionnaire completed by patients at the end of the study about their preference of which type of physiotherapy received. The weight of both dry and wet sputum produced was similar in the 3 arms of the study. Spirometry values but not oxygen saturation were reduced after HAT and flutter therapy sessions. HAT therapy was preferred to flutter and placebo in terms of breathlessness, ease of sputum production and relaxation. Of the patients, 70% stated that they would choose HAT as their preferred physiotherapy method compared to 0% for flutter (χ(2) = 20.3, p < 0.0001). There were no procedure-related complications in any of the 3 arms of the study. HAT was found to be safe, well tolerated and favoured by the majority of CF patients. The effect of HAT, however, on sputum production was not superior to flutter or placebo.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨一种新型痰液清除系统——水动力呼吸治疗(Hydro Acoustic Therapy,HAT)在囊性纤维化(cystic fibrosis,CF)患者中的疗效、安全性和患者接受程度。这是一项前瞻性交叉研究,共纳入 18 例患者,在 6 天内接受了 6 次不同的物理治疗。这些治疗包括 2 次 HAT、振荡阀或坐在有声音但无振动的浴盆中(安慰剂),每次 30 分钟。通过测量每次治疗后湿痰和干痰的重量以及肺功能值的变化来评估疗效。通过患者在研究结束时完成的问卷评估对治疗的偏好,评估内容包括患者对接受的哪种类型的物理治疗的偏好。三种治疗方法产生的干痰和湿痰的重量相似。HAT 和振荡治疗后,肺功能值(而非血氧饱和度)降低。在呼吸困难、痰液产生的容易程度和放松程度方面,HAT 治疗比振荡治疗和安慰剂更受患者青睐。在接受治疗的患者中,有 70%表示会选择 HAT 作为首选的物理治疗方法,而选择振荡治疗的比例为 0%(χ²=20.3,p<0.0001)。三种治疗方法均未发生与治疗相关的并发症。HAT 被发现安全、耐受良好,且受到大多数 CF 患者的青睐。然而,HAT 对痰液产生的影响并不优于振荡治疗或安慰剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验