Ruoff K L, de la Maza L, Murtagh M J, Spargo J D, Ferraro M J
Francis Blake Bacteriology Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Mar;28(3):435-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.3.435-437.1990.
Conventional tests and commercially available systems were used to determine the species identities of clinical isolates of enterococci. Strict adherence to the conventional test scheme of Facklam and Collins (R. R. Facklam and M. D. Collins, J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:731-734, 1989) resulted in the misidentification of lactose-negative Enterococcus faecalis isolates as Enterococcus solitarius, but this problem was overcome by the application of additional tests. The commercially available systems tested were unable to recognize some of the more recently described enterococcal species. E. faecalis accounted for 87.1% of 302 consecutive isolates. Enterococcus faecium (8.6%), Enterococcus avium (0.7%), Enterococcus durans (0.3%), Enterococcus gallinarum (1.0%), Enterococcus casseliflavus (1.0%), Enterococcus hirae (0.3%), and Enterococcus raffinosus (0.3%) isolates were also identified. None of the isolates produced beta-lactamase, but 15.4% of 235 isolates tested, including 1 strain of E. gallinarum, displayed high-level resistance to gentamicin.
采用传统检测方法和市售系统来确定肠球菌临床分离株的菌种身份。严格遵循Facklam和Collins的传统检测方案(R. R. Facklam和M. D. Collins,《临床微生物学杂志》27:731 - 734,1989年)会导致乳糖阴性的粪肠球菌分离株被误鉴定为孤独肠球菌,但通过应用额外检测克服了这一问题。所测试的市售系统无法识别一些最近描述的肠球菌菌种。在302株连续分离株中,粪肠球菌占87.1%。还鉴定出了屎肠球菌(8.6%)、鸟肠球菌(0.7%)、耐久肠球菌(0.3%)、鹑鸡肠球菌(1.0%)、格氏肠球菌(1.0%)、海氏肠球菌(0.3%)和棉子糖肠球菌(0.3%)分离株。所有分离株均不产生β - 内酰胺酶,但在235株测试分离株中,有15.4%,包括1株鹑鸡肠球菌,对庆大霉素表现出高水平耐药。