Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Apr;27(4):785-92. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.554807. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
To examine the impact of medication choice between duloxetine or pregabalin on medication adherence and direct healthcare costs among patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP).
A retrospective cohort study design was used with a large US national administrative claims database. Commercially-insured DPNP patients aged 18-64 years who initiated duloxetine or pregabalin in 2006 were selected, with the first initiation date as the index date. All selected patients had 12 months continuous enrollment in the pre- and post-index periods, and were grouped into the duloxetine or pregabalin cohort based on the index agent. The duloxetine and pregabalin cohorts were constructed via propensity score stratification with similar demographics, co-morbid medical conditions, pre-index healthcare utilization and costs, and prior treatment patterns. Medication possession ratio (MPR), proportion of patients with MPR ≥ 0.8 and healthcare costs over the 12-month post-index period were compared between cohorts.
Both the duloxetine (n = 794) and pregabalin (n = 1779) cohorts had a mean age of 56 years, and 58% of female. Common co-morbid conditions among duloxetine and pregabalin patients were cardiovascular disease (82.5 vs. 82.2%), neuropathic pain other than DPNP (71.1 vs. 72.7%), osteoarthritis (39.0 vs. 41.3%), and low back pain (29.4 vs. 30.5%). More than 73% of the patients had opioid use prior to the initiation of duloxetine or pregabalin. Among patients with similar demographic, clinical and economic characteristics, and prior treatment patterns, duloxetine-treated patients had significantly higher MPR (0.34 vs. 0.13), higher proportion of patients with MPR ≥ 0.8 (15.5 vs. 0.7%), and significantly lower total healthcare costs ($34,146 vs. 34,897) over the 12-month post-index period than pregabalin-treated patients (all p < 0.05).
Commercially-insured DPNP patients initiating duloxetine had significantly higher medication adherence and lower healthcare costs than those initiating pregabalin.
研究在糖尿病周围神经病理性疼痛(DPNP)患者中,选择度洛西汀或普瑞巴林进行药物治疗对药物依从性和直接医疗成本的影响。
采用回顾性队列研究设计,利用美国大型国家行政索赔数据库。选择 2006 年开始使用度洛西汀或普瑞巴林的年龄在 18-64 岁的商业保险 DPNP 患者,将首次用药日期作为索引日期。所有入选患者在索引前和索引后 12 个月均有连续参保,根据索引药物将患者分为度洛西汀或普瑞巴林队列。通过倾向评分分层,按照相似的人口统计学特征、合并症、索引前医疗保健利用和费用以及既往治疗模式,将度洛西汀和普瑞巴林队列构建为相似组。比较两组患者在索引后 12 个月的药物使用比例(MPR)、MPR≥0.8 的患者比例和医疗费用。
度洛西汀(n=794)和普瑞巴林(n=1779)队列的平均年龄均为 56 岁,58%为女性。度洛西汀和普瑞巴林患者常见的合并症包括心血管疾病(82.5%比 82.2%)、除 DPNP 以外的神经病理性疼痛(71.1%比 72.7%)、骨关节炎(39.0%比 41.3%)和下腰痛(29.4%比 30.5%)。在开始使用度洛西汀或普瑞巴林之前,超过 73%的患者使用了阿片类药物。在具有相似的人口统计学、临床和经济特征以及既往治疗模式的患者中,与普瑞巴林治疗的患者相比,度洛西汀治疗的患者 MPR 显著更高(0.34 比 0.13),MPR≥0.8 的患者比例更高(15.5%比 0.7%),索引后 12 个月的总医疗费用显著更低(34146 美元比 34897 美元)(均 p<0.05)。
开始使用度洛西汀的商业保险 DPNP 患者的药物依从性显著高于开始使用普瑞巴林的患者,且医疗费用更低。