Department of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 15;36(24):2089-93. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ffeb5e.
A restrospective review of 81 cases of osteoid osteoma of the mobile spine submitted to surgical treatment.
Analyze pro and contras of different techniques (conventional and minimally invasive) for the treatment of osteoid osteoma.
Intralesional excision has been considered the standard treatment for spinal osteoid osteoma. The high success rate of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of a variety of spinal disorders lead us to believe this technique can also be applicable for the treatment of osteoid osteoma of the spine.
Eighty-one patients affected by osteoid osteoma were consecutively treated by the same team with intralesional excision using conventional or minimally invasive approach by video-assisted endoscopy, microscope, or percutaneous radiofrequency coagulation. The clinical features, the radiologic findings, and the outcome were reviewed. Pain and neurologic symptoms, were scored before surgery, after surgery and at the follow-up. Complications and local recurrences were also recorded.
Immediate relief of pain was observed after surgery in all patients. One patient showed mild neurologic impairment before treatment but became free of neurologic symptoms postoperative. Five local recurrences were found in four patients, always associated with pain. Three of these patients underwent surgery for a second time and one patient for a third time. There were two complications because surgery in two patients. One patient developed a pneumothorax, the other a hematoma. No related cases of kyphosis or scoliosis surgery were observed.
Conventional excision therapy is a effective and reliable treatment for osteoid osteoma associated to low morbidity and low local recurrence rate. Minimally invasive surgery is emerging as an alternative method, reducing soft tissue trauma and the collateral damage caused by traditional surgical approach, allow patients a more rapid and complete return to normal function.
回顾性分析 81 例脊柱活动部骨样骨瘤病例,均行手术治疗。
分析不同技术(传统与微创)治疗骨样骨瘤的优缺点。
病灶内切除术被认为是脊柱骨样骨瘤的标准治疗方法。微创技术在治疗各种脊柱疾病方面取得了较高的成功率,这使我们相信该技术也适用于脊柱骨样骨瘤的治疗。
同一团队采用传统或微创方法(通过电视辅助内镜、显微镜或经皮射频消融术)对 81 例骨样骨瘤患者进行病灶内切除术。回顾性分析患者的临床特征、影像学表现和治疗结果。术前、术后及随访时对疼痛和神经症状进行评分。记录并发症和局部复发情况。
所有患者术后疼痛均立即缓解。1 例患者术前存在轻度神经功能障碍,但术后神经症状消失。4 例患者中有 5 例出现局部复发,均伴有疼痛。其中 3 例患者再次手术,1 例患者第三次手术。2 例患者出现 2 种并发症。1 例患者发生气胸,另 1 例患者发生血肿。未观察到与后凸畸形或脊柱侧凸相关的手术病例。
传统切除术是治疗骨样骨瘤的有效且可靠方法,其发病率和局部复发率均较低。微创技术作为一种替代方法正在出现,它减少了软组织损伤和传统手术入路引起的附带损伤,使患者更快、更完全地恢复正常功能。