Division of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, University of Southampton School of Medicine and National Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 May;127(5):1148-54.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.01.023. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
Rhinoviruses are the major cause of asthma exacerbations. Previous studies suggest that primary bronchial epithelial cells (PBECs) from asthmatic subjects are more susceptible to rhinovirus infection because of deficient IFN-β production. Although augmenting the innate immune response might provide a novel approach for treatment of virus-induced asthma exacerbations, the potential of IFN-β to modulate antiviral and proinflammatory responses in asthmatic epithelium is poorly characterized.
We sought to compare responses of PBECs from nonasthmatic and asthmatic subjects to exogenous IFN-β and test the inflammatory effects of IFN-β in response to rhinovirus infection.
PBECs were treated with IFN-β and infected with a low inoculum of human rhinovirus serotype 1B to simulate a natural viral infection. Expression of interferon-responsive genes and inflammatory responses were analyzed by using reverse transcription-quantitative real-time PCR, cytometric bead arrays, or both; viral titers were assessed by using the 50% tissue culture infection dose.
Expression of IFN-β-stimulated antiviral genes was comparable in PBECs from nonasthmatic or asthmatic donors. Exogenous IFN-β significantly protected PBECs from asthmatic donors against rhinovirus infection by suppressing viral replication. Interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10), RANTES, and IL-6 release in response to rhinovirus infection was triggered only in PBECs from asthmatic donors. Although exogenous IFN-β alone stimulated some release of IP-10 (but not IL-6 or RANTES), it significantly reduced rhinovirus-induced IP-10, RANTES, and IL-6 expression when tested in combination with rhinovirus.
PBECs from asthmatic donors have a normal antiviral response to exogenous IFN-β. The ability of IFN-β to suppress viral replication suggests that it might limit virus-induced exacerbations by shortening the duration of the inflammatory response.
鼻病毒是哮喘恶化的主要原因。先前的研究表明,由于 IFN-β 产生不足,哮喘患者的原代支气管上皮细胞(PBEC)更容易感染鼻病毒。虽然增强先天免疫反应可能为治疗病毒引起的哮喘恶化提供一种新方法,但 IFN-β 调节哮喘上皮细胞抗病毒和促炎反应的潜力尚未得到充分描述。
我们旨在比较非哮喘和哮喘患者的 PBEC 对外源性 IFN-β 的反应,并测试 IFN-β 对鼻病毒感染的炎症作用。
用 IFN-β 处理 PBEC 并用低接种量的人鼻病毒 1B 型(HRV1B)模拟自然病毒感染。通过逆转录定量实时 PCR、细胞因子珠阵列或两者并用分析干扰素反应基因的表达和炎症反应;通过 50%组织培养感染剂量评估病毒滴度。
非哮喘或哮喘供体的 PBEC 中 IFN-β 刺激的抗病毒基因表达相当。外源性 IFN-β 通过抑制病毒复制,显著保护来自哮喘供体的 PBEC 免受 HRV1B 感染。仅在来自哮喘供体的 PBEC 中,IFN-β 诱导蛋白 10(IP-10)、RANTES 和 IL-6 释放会对 HRV1B 感染产生反应。尽管外源性 IFN-β 单独刺激了 IP-10 的一些释放(但不是 IL-6 或 RANTES),但当与 HRV1B 联合测试时,它显著降低了 HRV1B 诱导的 IP-10、RANTES 和 IL-6 的表达。
哮喘供体的 PBEC 对外源性 IFN-β 具有正常的抗病毒反应。IFN-β 抑制病毒复制的能力表明,它可能通过缩短炎症反应的持续时间来限制病毒引起的恶化。