Clínica La Milagrosa, Madrid, Spain.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2011 Jul-Sep;25(3):213-9. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3182087dbc.
To determine the usefulness of a formal, structured, nonpharmacological treatment for apathetic dementia patients.
A controlled, cross-over, randomized, simple-blind, multicentre clinical trial. A total of 146 institutionalized or day care dementia patients with a stage 1 or 2 Clinical Dementia Rating, with no significant motor or sensory problems, or with rapidly evolving dementia and in a clinically stable state were recruited. A cognitive mini examination, and functional, depression, and potential toxicity scales, Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q), and Dementia Apathy Interview and Rating (DAIR) scales were applied at baseline. Patients were randomized to initial intervention (music and art therapy and psychomotor activity) or initial control (free activities in the day room) and changed over at 4 weeks. NPI-Q and DAIR scales were administered at the end of weeks 4 and 8.
A significant difference between intervention and control periods, as measured using the DAIR scale, was observed, with a difference of 0.21 (95% confidence interval: 0.07-0.34, P<0.005). The difference was very important in the patients with moderated apathy. However, differences were not so important in the patients with severe apathy and there were no differences at all in the non-apathetic patients. No significant differences were found with the NPI-Q scale, although there was a clear improvement trend in the "apathy" question on this scale. This effect seems to extend beyond the therapeutic intervention period.
A structured, nonpharmacological, short-term occupational therapy intervention is more useful than activities of the patients' own choice for improving apathy in patients with mild or moderate dementia.
确定一种正式的、结构化的、非药物治疗方法对淡漠型痴呆患者的有效性。
一项对照、交叉、随机、简单盲法、多中心临床试验。共纳入 146 名住院或日间护理的痴呆患者,临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)为 1 或 2 期,无明显运动或感觉问题,或处于快速进展性痴呆且临床稳定状态。在基线时进行认知迷你检查以及功能、抑郁和潜在毒性量表、神经精神问卷(NPI-Q)和痴呆淡漠评估和分级量表(DAIR)的评估。患者随机分为初始干预组(音乐和艺术治疗以及精神运动活动)或初始对照组(日间活动室的自由活动),并在 4 周后进行转换。在第 4 周和第 8 周末进行 NPI-Q 和 DAIR 量表的评估。
使用 DAIR 量表测量,干预组与对照组之间存在显著差异,差异为 0.21(95%置信区间:0.07-0.34,P<0.005)。在中度淡漠的患者中,差异非常显著。然而,在重度淡漠的患者中差异并不显著,在非淡漠的患者中则没有差异。虽然 NPI-Q 量表的差异不显著,但该量表的“淡漠”问题存在明显的改善趋势。这种效应似乎超出了治疗干预期。
与患者自行选择的活动相比,结构化的、非药物的、短期职业治疗干预对改善轻度或中度痴呆患者的淡漠更有效。