Krueger Winfried H, Swanson Lindsey C, Tanasijevic Borko, Rasmussen Theodore P
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut 06269, USA.
Int J Dev Biol. 2010;54(11-12):1545-64. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.103199wk.
Pluripotent cells of the blastocyst inner cell mass (ICM) and their in vitro derivatives, embryonic stem (ES) cells, contain genomes in an epigenetic state that are poised for subsequent differentiation. Their chromatin is hyperdynamic in nature and relatively uncondensed. In addition, a large number of genes are expressed at low levels in both ICM and ES cells. Also, the chromatin of naturally pluripotent cells contains specialized histone modification patterns such as bivalent domains, which mark genes destined for later developmentally-regulated expression states. Female pluripotent cells contain X chromosomes that have yet to undergo the process of X chromosome inactivation. Collectively, these features of very early embyronic chromatin are required for the successful specification and production of differentiated cell lineages. Artificial reprogramming methods such as somatic nuclear transfer (SCNT), ES cell fusion-mediated reprogramming (FMR), and induced pluripotency (iPS) yield pluripotent cells that recapitulate many features of naturally pluripotent cells, including many of their epigenetic features. However, the route to pluripotent epigenomic states in artificial pluripotent cells differs drastically from that of their natural counterparts. Here, we compare and contrast the differing routes to pluripotency under natural and artificial conditions. In addition, we discuss the intrinsically metastable nature of the pluripotent epigenome and consider epigenetic aspects of reprogramming that may lead to incomplete or inaccurate reprogrammed states. Artificial methods of reprogramming hold immense promise for the development of autologous cell graft sources and for the development of cell culture models for human genetic disorders. However, the utility of artificially reprogrammed cells is highly dependent on the fidelity of the reprogramming process and it is therefore critically important to assess the epigenetic similarities between embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells.
囊胚内细胞团(ICM)的多能细胞及其体外衍生物胚胎干细胞(ES细胞),其基因组处于一种表观遗传状态,为后续分化做好了准备。它们的染色质本质上是高度动态的,且相对未浓缩。此外,大量基因在ICM和ES细胞中均低水平表达。而且,天然多能细胞的染色质包含特殊的组蛋白修饰模式,如双价结构域,这些结构域标记着注定要进入后期发育调控表达状态的基因。雌性多能细胞含有尚未经历X染色体失活过程的X染色体。总的来说,早期胚胎染色质的这些特征对于成功指定和产生分化细胞谱系是必需的。人工重编程方法,如体细胞核移植(SCNT)、ES细胞融合介导的重编程(FMR)和诱导多能性(iPS),产生的多能细胞概括了天然多能细胞的许多特征,包括它们的许多表观遗传特征。然而,人工多能细胞达到多能表观基因组状态的途径与天然多能细胞的途径截然不同。在这里,我们比较并对比了天然和人工条件下达到多能性的不同途径。此外,我们讨论了多能表观基因组的内在亚稳态性质,并考虑了可能导致重编程状态不完全或不准确的重编程表观遗传方面。人工重编程方法在自体细胞移植来源的开发以及人类遗传疾病细胞培养模型的开发方面具有巨大潜力。然而,人工重编程细胞的效用高度依赖于重编程过程的保真度,因此评估胚胎干细胞和诱导多能干细胞之间的表观遗传相似性至关重要。