Center of Excellence for Biomedical and Public Health Informatics (BIOPHICS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Malar J. 2011 May 10;10:120. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-120.
Reliable information on mobility patterns of migrants is a crucial part of the strategy to contain the spread of artemisinin-resistant malaria parasites in South-East Asia, and may also be helpful to efforts to address other public health problems for migrants and members of host communities. In order to limit the spread of malarial drug resistance, the malaria prevention and control programme will need to devise strategies to reach cross-border and mobile migrant populations.
The Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) method was used to survey migrant workers from Cambodia and Myanmar, both registered and undocumented, in three Thai provinces on the Thailand-Cambodia border in close proximity to areas with documented artemisinin-resistant malaria parasites. 1,719 participants (828 Cambodian and 891 Myanmar migrants) were recruited. Subpopulations of migrant workers were analysed using the Thailand Ministry of Health classification based on length of residence in Thailand of greater than six months (long-term, or M1) or less than six months (short-term, or M2). Key information collected on the structured questionnaire included patterns of mobility and migration, demographic characteristics, treatment-seeking behaviours, and knowledge, perceptions, and practices about malaria.
Workers from Cambodia came from provinces across Cambodia, and 22% of Cambodian M1 and 72% of Cambodian M2 migrants had been in Cambodia in the last three months. Less than 6% returned with a frequency of greater than once per month. Of migrants from Cambodia, 32% of M1 and 68% of M2 were planning to return, and named provinces across Cambodia as their likely next destinations. Most workers from Myanmar came from Mon state (86%), had never returned to Myanmar (85%), and only 4% stated plans to return.
Information on migratory patterns of migrants from Myanmar and Cambodia along the malaria endemic Thailand-Cambodian border within the artemisinin resistance containment zone will help target health interventions, including treatment follow-up and surveillance.
可靠的流动人口模式信息是遏制东南亚青蒿素耐药疟原虫传播的策略的重要组成部分,也可能有助于解决移民和收容社区成员的其他公共卫生问题。为了限制抗疟药物耐药性的传播,疟疾防治规划将需要制定策略,以覆盖跨境和流动的移民人口。
采用回应者驱动抽样(RDS)方法,在靠近有记录的青蒿素耐药疟疾地区的泰国与柬埔寨边境的三个泰国省份,对来自柬埔寨和缅甸的登记和未登记移民工人(828 名柬埔寨移民和 891 名缅甸移民)进行调查。对移民工人的亚群使用泰国卫生部基于在泰国居住时间大于或等于 6 个月(长期或 M1)或小于 6 个月(短期或 M2)的分类进行分析。在结构化问卷中收集的关键信息包括流动和迁移模式、人口特征、求医行为以及对疟疾的知识、看法和做法。
来自柬埔寨的工人来自柬埔寨各地省份,22%的柬埔寨 M1 移民和 72%的柬埔寨 M2 移民在过去三个月内在柬埔寨。不到 6%的人每月返回一次以上。来自柬埔寨的移民中,32%的 M1 和 68%的 M2 计划返回,将柬埔寨各地省份列为可能的下一个目的地。来自缅甸的大多数工人来自蒙育瓦省(86%),从未返回缅甸(85%),只有 4%表示有返回计划。
在青蒿素耐药性遏制区内,关于柬埔寨和缅甸移民在疟疾流行的泰国-柬埔寨边境的迁徙模式的信息将有助于确定卫生干预措施的目标,包括治疗随访和监测。