Zhu Zezhang, Wang Xinhua, Qian Bangping, Wang Bin, Yu Yang, Zhao Qinghua, Qiu Yong
Spine Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Oct;25(7):383-90. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318224b199.
Retrospective comparison of database patients.
To evaluate the difference of loss of correction between Smith-Petersen osteotomies (SPOs) and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
SPOs and PSO are reported to be the 2 major techniques for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis resulting from AS. Previous studies have tried to compare the indication, technical aspects, correction obtained, and complication rates between the aforementioned 2 techniques. However, reports addressing a comparison of loss of correction between SPOs and PSO are limited.
On the basis of the types of osteotomies, 50 patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) SPOs group (n=19) including 16 male and 3 female patients, with an age range from 21 to 40 years (mean 27 y). The preoperative global kyphosis (GK) ranged from 41 to 99 degrees (average 64.6±25.6 degrees); (2) PSO group (n=31) consisted of 26 male and 5 female patients, with an age range from 22 to 54 years (mean 36 y). The preoperative GK was 50 to 96 degrees (average 73.7±23.6 degrees). Radiographic parameters including sagittal vertical axis, T12-S1 lordosis, GK, and angle of fusion levels were measured.
Both groups showed similar preoperative and postoperative thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis. The average GK was corrected to 25.5 degrees and 31.4 degrees in SPOs group and PSO group, respectively. All cases were followed for a minimum of 2 years. At the last follow-up, mean loss of correction in the fusion levels were 6.1 degrees in SPOs group and 1.3 degrees in PSO group, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P=0.034). Loss of correction of >5 degrees occurred in 4 cases (21.1%) in SPOs group, and 5 cases (16.1%) in PSO group.
Both SPOs and PSO showed similar effect in correcting the thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. However, patients treated with the SPOs technique showed higher risk in loss of correction in the instrumented region.
对数据库患者进行回顾性比较。
评估强直性脊柱炎(AS)继发胸腰椎后凸患者中,Smith-Petersen截骨术(SPO)与椎弓根截骨术(PSO)在矫正丢失方面的差异。
据报道,SPO和PSO是矫正AS所致胸腰椎后凸的两种主要技术。以往研究试图比较上述两种技术的适应症、技术细节、获得的矫正效果及并发症发生率。然而,关于SPO和PSO之间矫正丢失比较的报道有限。
根据截骨类型,将50例患者分为两组:(1)SPO组(n = 19),包括16例男性和3例女性患者,年龄范围21至40岁(平均27岁)。术前整体后凸(GK)范围为41至99度(平均64.6±25.6度);(2)PSO组(n = 31),由26例男性和5例女性患者组成,年龄范围22至54岁(平均36岁)。术前GK为50至96度(平均73.7±23.6度)。测量包括矢状垂直轴、T12 - S1前凸、GK以及融合节段角度等影像学参数。
两组患者术前和术后的胸椎后凸、腰椎前凸及矢状垂直轴均相似。SPO组和PSO组的平均GK分别矫正至25.5度和31.4度。所有病例均至少随访2年。在最后一次随访时,SPO组和PSO组融合节段的平均矫正丢失分别为6.1度和1.3度。差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.034)。SPO组有4例(21.1%)矫正丢失>5度,PSO组有5例(16.1%)。
SPO和PSO在矫正AS继发的胸腰椎后凸方面效果相似。然而,接受SPO技术治疗的患者在器械固定区域矫正丢失的风险更高。