Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA and CIBERNED), Neurosciences, Basal Ganglia Laboratory, University of Navarra, Pio XII Ave 55 Edificio CIMA, 31008 Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
J Chem Neuroanat. 2011 Nov;42(3):157-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
Most of our current understanding of brain function and dysfunction has its firm base in what is so elegantly called the 'anatomical substrate', i.e. the anatomical, histological, and histochemical domains within the large knowledge envelope called 'neuroscience' that further includes physiological, pharmacological, neurochemical, behavioral, genetical and clinical domains. This review focuses mainly on the anatomical domain in neuroscience. To a large degree neuroanatomical tract-tracing methods have paved the way in this domain. Over the past few decades, a great number of neuroanatomical tracers have been added to the technical arsenal to fulfill almost any experimental demand. Despite this sophisticated arsenal, the decision which tracer is best suited for a given tracing experiment still represents a difficult choice. Although this review is obviously not intended to provide the last word in the tract-tracing field, we provide a survey of the available tracing methods including some of their roots. We further summarize our experience with neuroanatomical tracers, in an attempt to provide the novice user with some advice to help this person to select the most appropriate criteria to choose a tracer that best applies to a given experimental design.
我们目前对大脑功能和功能障碍的大部分理解都有其坚实的基础,这被巧妙地称为“解剖基质”,即“神经科学”这个大知识范围内的解剖学、组织学和组织化学领域,它还包括生理学、药理学、神经化学、行为学、遗传学和临床领域。本篇综述主要关注神经科学中的解剖领域。在这个领域,神经解剖追踪方法在很大程度上已经铺平了道路。在过去的几十年里,已经有大量的神经解剖示踪剂被添加到技术武器库中,以满足几乎任何实验的需求。尽管有了这样复杂的武器库,但是对于给定的追踪实验来说,哪种示踪剂最适合仍然是一个艰难的选择。尽管本篇综述显然不是为了提供追踪领域的最终定论,但我们提供了对现有追踪方法的调查,包括它们的一些根源。我们进一步总结了我们在神经解剖示踪剂方面的经验,试图为新手用户提供一些建议,帮助他们选择最适合特定实验设计的示踪剂的最适当标准。