Medical Research, Purdue Pharma, LP, Stamford, Connecticut 06901, USA.
J Pain. 2011 Nov;12(11):1163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
In this enriched design study, 1,160 opioid-experienced patients with chronic, moderate to severe low back pain entered an open-label run-in period; 660 demonstrated analgesic benefit from and tolerability to buprenorphine transdermal system 20 mcg/hour (BTDS 20) treatment and were randomized to receive either BTDS 20, BTDS 5 mcg/hour (BTDS 5), or the active control (immediate release oxycodone 40-mg/day) during an 84-day double-blind phase. The primary endpoint, "average pain in the last 24 hours" during double-blind weeks 4, 8, and 12, was significantly lower for patients receiving BTDS 20 compared with patients receiving BTDS 5 (P < .001, treatment difference of -.67). A treatment difference of -.75 in favor of oxycodone 40 mg/day versus BTDS 5 (P < .001) indicated the assay sensitivity of the study. Four sensitivity analyses, secondary, and exploratory analyses supported the results of the primary analysis. Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were 56% during the open-label period, and 59, 77, and 73% for the BTDS 5, BTDS 20, and oxycodone 40 mg/day treatment groups, respectively, during the double-blind phase. One death considered unrelated to study treatment occurred in a patient receiving BTDS 10 during the run-in period. BTDS 20 treatment was demonstrated to be efficacious and generally well tolerated.
This article presents results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine (BTDS). In this active controlled, superiority study with an enriched design, BTDS 20 was found to be efficacious and generally well tolerated.
在这项强化设计研究中,1160 名慢性中重度腰痛的阿片类药物经验患者进入开放性导入期;660 名患者显示出对丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂 20 微克/小时(BTDS 20)治疗有镇痛作用和耐受性,并被随机分为 BTDS 20、BTDS 5 微克/小时(BTDS 5)或阳性对照(即即时释放型盐酸羟考酮 40 毫克/天)组,在 84 天的双盲期接受治疗。主要终点为双盲期第 4、8 和 12 周的“过去 24 小时平均疼痛”,接受 BTDS 20 治疗的患者显著低于接受 BTDS 5 治疗的患者(P<.001,治疗差异为-.67)。羟考酮 40mg/天与 BTDS 5 相比,治疗差异为-.75,表明该研究具有较高的检测灵敏度。四项敏感性分析、次要分析和探索性分析支持主要分析结果。开放性导入期的治疗中出现不良事件的发生率为 56%,双盲期 BTDS 5、BTDS 20 和羟考酮 40mg/天组的发生率分别为 59%、77%和 73%。在导入期接受 BTDS 10 治疗的患者中,有 1 例死亡被认为与研究治疗无关。BTDS 20 治疗被证明是有效的,且通常具有良好的耐受性。
本文介绍了一项评估治疗慢性腰痛新疗法的关键 3 期研究结果:一种含有阿片类药物丁丙诺啡的透皮贴剂(BTDS)。在这项强化设计、阳性对照研究中,BTDS 20 被证明是有效的,且通常具有良好的耐受性。