Div. of Cardiology, Dept. of Medicine, PO Box 3022, Duke Univ. Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Nov;301(5):E1033-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00291.2011. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
While the benefits of exercise are clear, many unresolved issues surround the optimal exercise prescription. Many organizations recommend aerobic training (AT) and resistance training (RT), yet few studies have compared their effects alone or in combination. The purpose of this study, part of Studies Targeting Risk Reduction Interventions Through Defined Exercise-Aerobic Training and/or Resistance Training (STRRIDE/AT/RT), was to compare the effects of AT, RT, and the full combination (AT/RT) on central ectopic fat, liver enzymes, and fasting insulin resistance [homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)]. In a randomized trial, 249 subjects [18-70 yr old, overweight, sedentary, with moderate dyslipidemia (LDL cholesterol 130-190 mg/dl or HDL cholesterol ≤ 40 mg/dl for men or ≤ 45 mg/dl for women)] performed an initial 4-mo run-in period. Of these, 196 finished the run-in and were randomized into one of the following 8-mo exercise-training groups: 1) RT, which comprised 3 days/wk, 8 exercises, 3 sets/exercise, 8-12 repetitions/set, 2) AT, which was equivalent to ∼19.2 km/wk (12 miles/wk) at 75% peak O(2) uptake, and 3) full AT + full RT (AT/RT), with 155 subjects completing the intervention. The primary outcome variables were as follows: visceral and liver fat via CT, plasma liver enzymes, and HOMA. AT led to significant reductions in liver fat, visceral fat, alanine aminotransferase, HOMA, and total and subcutaneous abdominal fat (all P < 0.05). RT resulted in a decrease in subcutaneous abdominal fat (P < 0.05) but did not significantly improve the other variables. AT was more effective than RT at improving visceral fat, liver-to-spleen ratio, and total abdominal fat (all P < 0.05) and trended toward a greater reduction in liver fat score (P < 0.10). The effects of AT/RT were statistically indistinguishable from the effects of AT. These data show that, for overweight and obese individuals who want to reduce measures of visceral fat and fatty liver infiltration and improve HOMA and alanine aminotransferase, a moderate amount of aerobic exercise is the most time-efficient and effective exercise mode.
虽然运动的好处是显而易见的,但仍有许多悬而未决的问题围绕着最佳运动处方。许多组织建议进行有氧运动 (AT) 和抗阻训练 (RT),但很少有研究单独或联合比较它们的效果。本研究是 Studies Targeting Risk Reduction Interventions Through Defined Exercise-Aerobic Training and/or Resistance Training (STRRIDE/AT/RT) 的一部分,旨在比较 AT、RT 和完整组合 (AT/RT) 对中央异位脂肪、肝酶和空腹胰岛素抵抗[稳态模型评估 (HOMA)]的影响。在一项随机试验中,249 名受试者[18-70 岁,超重,久坐,血脂中度异常 (LDL 胆固醇 130-190mg/dl 或男性 HDL 胆固醇≤40mg/dl 或女性 HDL 胆固醇≤45mg/dl)]进行了为期 4 个月的初始适应期。其中,196 名受试者完成了适应期,并被随机分为以下 8 个月运动训练组之一:1) RT,包括每周 3 天,8 项运动,3 组/运动,8-12 次/组,2) AT,相当于每周约 19.2 公里 (12 英里/周),峰值 O(2)摄取率为 75%,3) 完全 AT+完全 RT (AT/RT),共有 155 名受试者完成了干预。主要观察指标如下:通过 CT 评估内脏和肝脏脂肪、血浆肝酶和 HOMA。AT 可显著降低肝脏脂肪、内脏脂肪、丙氨酸氨基转移酶、HOMA、总腹部脂肪和皮下腹部脂肪 (均 P < 0.05)。RT 可减少皮下腹部脂肪 (P < 0.05),但其他变量无显著改善。AT 在改善内脏脂肪、肝脾比和总腹部脂肪方面比 RT 更有效 (均 P < 0.05),且肝脏脂肪评分降低趋势更为显著 (P < 0.10)。AT/RT 的效果与 AT 的效果无统计学差异。这些数据表明,对于想要减少内脏脂肪和脂肪肝浸润程度、改善 HOMA 和丙氨酸氨基转移酶的超重和肥胖个体,中等量的有氧运动是最省时有效的运动方式。