Suppr超能文献

欧洲的精神卫生保健与自付费用:ESEMeD项目的结果

Mental health care and out-of-pocket expenditures in Europe: results from the ESEMeD project.

作者信息

Sevilla-Dedieu Christine, Kovess-Masfety Viviane, Gilbert Fabien, Vilagut Gemma, Koenig Hans-Helmut, Bruffaerts Ronny, Haro Josep Maria, Alonso Jordi

机构信息

MGEN Foundation for Public Health, 3 square Max Hymans, 75748 Paris Cedex 15, France.

出版信息

J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2011 Jun;14(2):95-105.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most published data on out-of-pocket spending on mental health originate from the United States, where insurance payments for mental health have traditionally been much less generous than benefits for other health care services. Given the difference in the structure of health care funding in Europe, it is clearly important to obtain similar information on out-of-pocket expenditure in different European countries.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To estimate out-of-pocket costs paid by people who receive mental health care in six European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain).

METHODS

Of the 8,796 participants in a cross-sectional survey conducted in these six European countries, 1,128 reported having consulted a professional for a mental health problem in the year preceding the interview and provided information on how many times in the past year they consulted each type of provider, and the money they and their family members had paid out-of-pocket for their mental health care. In addition to sociodemographic characteristics, information on mental health status was collected using the CIDI 3.0. Descriptive statistics on out-of-pocket expenditure and share of income across countries were generated. Two-part models were employed to identify the relationship between the different covariates, notably the types of providers consulted, and out-of-pocket expenditure.

RESULTS

Overall, 41.0% of those who used services for a mental health problem paid something for the care they received. This represented a minority of respondents in all countries except Belgium (87.9%) and Italy (61.7%). The financial burden of these costs relative to income was found to be low (1.2%), ranging from 0.4% in Germany to 2.3% in France. Out-of-pocket expenditure differed according to the type of providers consulted, with non-physician health professionals and medical specialists being more often associated with significant expenditure.

DISCUSSION AND LIMITATIONS

Although the study is limited principally by data collection from self-report, it is the first of its kind, to our knowledge, and suggests that out-of-pocket costs for mental health care in Europe are relatively low compared to the United States. However, differences between countries exist, which may be partially due to differences in coverage for specialized care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES

Consultations with non-physician mental health professionals such as psychologists are expensive for patients, since they are reimbursed to a lesser extent than consultations with physicians, or not reimbursed at all. This limits their role and increases the burden on psychiatrists.

IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Monitoring out-of-pocket spending on mental health, preferably on the basis of administrative data when available, is essential in the current context of cost containment policy, where out-of-pocket spending may be expected to increase.

摘要

背景

大多数已发表的关于心理健康自付费用的数据来自美国,在美国,心理健康保险支付传统上远不如其他医疗服务福利慷慨。鉴于欧洲医疗保健资金结构的差异,获取不同欧洲国家自付费用的类似信息显然很重要。

研究目的

估计六个欧洲国家(比利时、法国、德国、意大利、荷兰和西班牙)接受心理健康护理的人群的自付费用。

方法

在这六个欧洲国家进行的一项横断面调查的8796名参与者中,1128人报告在访谈前一年曾就心理健康问题咨询过专业人士,并提供了过去一年他们咨询每种类型提供者的次数,以及他们和家人为心理健康护理自掏腰包支付的费用信息。除社会人口学特征外,还使用CIDI 3.0收集了心理健康状况信息。生成了各国自付费用和收入份额的描述性统计数据。采用两部分模型来确定不同协变量之间的关系,特别是咨询的提供者类型与自付费用之间的关系。

结果

总体而言,有心理健康问题并使用服务的人群中,41.0%的人为他们接受的护理支付了费用。在除比利时(87.9%)和意大利(61.7%)之外的所有国家,这只占受访者的少数。相对于收入而言,这些费用的经济负担较低(1.2%),从德国的0.4%到法国的2.3%不等。自付费用因咨询的提供者类型而异,非医生健康专业人员和医学专家往往与较高的费用相关。

讨论与局限性

尽管该研究主要受自我报告数据收集的限制,但据我们所知,这是同类研究中的首例,表明与美国相比,欧洲心理健康护理的自付费用相对较低。然而,各国之间存在差异,这可能部分归因于专科护理覆盖范围的不同。

对卫生政策的启示

患者咨询心理学家等非医生心理健康专业人员的费用较高,因为他们获得的报销比咨询医生的报销要少,或者根本没有报销。这限制了他们的作用,并增加了精神科医生的负担。

对进一步研究的启示

在当前成本控制政策背景下,监测心理健康的自付费用至关重要,最好在有可用行政数据的基础上进行监测,因为预计自付费用可能会增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验