Department of Pharmacy, Harborview Medical Center and School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Dec;71(4):408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
Retrospective study aimed to examine outcomes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia in relationship to vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (VAN MIC) and serum trough concentrations among subjects who had ≥1 blood culture positive for MRSA between April 2008 and August 2009. Treatment failure occurred in 7/24 (29%) subjects with VAN MIC = 2 mg/L versus 20/94 (21%) subjects with VAN MIC ≤1.5 mg/L (adjusted OR 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-5.14). Among subjects who had documented VAN serum trough concentrations, treatment failure occurred in 5/26 (19%) subjects with concentrations <15 mg/L versus 18/68 (27%) subjects with concentrations ≥15 mg/L (adjusted OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.21-3.84). In conclusion, treatment outcomes were similar regardless of VAN MIC, although there was a non-statistically significant trend towards decreased clinical efficacy among patients with VAN MIC = 2 mg/L. Optimization of VAN pharmacokinetic indices did not appear to correlate with clinical responses.
本回顾性研究旨在探讨 2008 年 4 月至 2009 年 8 月期间≥1 份血培养阳性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的患者中万古霉素最小抑菌浓度(VAN MIC)和血清谷浓度与 MRSA 菌血症结局的关系。VAN MIC = 2mg/L 的 24 例患者中有 7 例(29%)治疗失败,而 VAN MIC≤1.5mg/L 的 94 例患者中有 20 例(21%)治疗失败(校正比值比 1.11,95%置信区间[CI]0.24-5.14)。在有记录的 VAN 血清谷浓度的患者中,浓度<15mg/L 的 26 例患者中有 5 例(19%)治疗失败,而浓度≥15mg/L 的 68 例患者中有 18 例(27%)治疗失败(校正比值比 0.91,95%CI0.21-3.84)。总之,无论 VAN MIC 如何,治疗结果相似,但 VAN MIC = 2mg/L 的患者临床疗效呈下降趋势,但无统计学意义。VAN 药代动力学指标的优化似乎与临床反应无关。