Suppr超能文献

单次试验归一化的事件相关光谱分解降低了对噪声试验的敏感性。

Single-trial normalization for event-related spectral decomposition reduces sensitivity to noisy trials.

机构信息

Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Paul Sabatier University Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 30;2:236. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00236. eCollection 2011.

Abstract

In electroencephalography, the classical event-related potential model often proves to be a limited method to study complex brain dynamics. For this reason, spectral techniques adapted from signal processing such as event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) - and its variant event-related synchronization and event-related desynchronization - have been used over the past 20 years. They represent average spectral changes in response to a stimulus. These spectral methods do not have strong consensus for comparing pre- and post-stimulus activity. When computing ERSP, pre-stimulus baseline removal is usually performed after averaging the spectral estimate of multiple trials. Correcting the baseline of each single-trial prior to averaging spectral estimates is an alternative baseline correction method. However, we show that this method leads to positively skewed post-stimulus ERSP values. We eventually present new single-trial-based ERSP baseline correction methods that perform trial normalization or centering prior to applying classical baseline correction methods. We show that single-trial correction methods minimize the contribution of artifactual data trials with high-amplitude spectral estimates and are robust to outliers when performing statistical inference testing. We then characterize these methods in terms of their time-frequency responses and behavior compared to classical ERSP methods.

摘要

在脑电图中,经典的事件相关电位模型往往被证明是一种有限的方法来研究复杂的大脑动力学。出于这个原因,过去 20 年来,已经使用了来自信号处理的谱技术,例如事件相关谱扰动(ERSP)及其变体事件相关同步和事件相关去同步。它们代表了对刺激的平均光谱变化。这些谱方法对于比较刺激前后的活动没有很强的共识。在计算 ERSP 时,通常在对多个试验的光谱估计值进行平均后,对刺激前的基线进行去除。在对光谱估计值进行平均之前,对每个单试验的基线进行校正,这是另一种基线校正方法。然而,我们表明,这种方法导致了刺激后 ERSP 值的正偏态。我们最终提出了新的基于单试验的 ERSP 基线校正方法,这些方法在应用经典基线校正方法之前对试验进行归一化或中心化。我们表明,单试验校正方法最小化了具有高振幅光谱估计的人为数据试验的贡献,并且在进行统计推断测试时对异常值具有鲁棒性。然后,我们根据它们的时频响应和行为来描述这些方法,与经典的 ERSP 方法相比。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cee6/3183439/7a0da94a5c11/fpsyg-02-00236-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验