Orlando Immunology Center, Orlando, FL 32803, USA.
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;65(12):1240-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02807.x. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
We report data from NEWART, a randomised phase 4 clinical trial comparing virologic efficacy and safety of nevirapine (NVP) vs. ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) on a background of tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) in HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve patients. This study enrolled patients according to CD4-based initiation criteria for NVP (<250 cells/mm(3) for women and <400 cells/mm(3) for men), to reduce the likelihood of symptomatic hepatic events. NEWART was designed to support and confirm results from ARTEN, an international trial with similar design and study endpoints.
A total of 152 patients were randomised 1 : 1 to open-label NVP 200 mg twice daily or ATV/r (300/100 mg) once daily, plus once daily TDF/FTC (300/200 mg). All participants met CD4(+) guidelines at entry. The primary endpoint for non-inferiority was virologic response prior to and at week 48 (confirmed HIV plasma viral load <50 copies/ml, without rebound or change in ARVs). Safety data, including plasma lipids, were recorded throughout the study.
The primary endpoint was achieved in 46/75 (61.3%) and 50/77 (64.9%) of patients taking NVP and ATV/r, respectively. Frequency of adverse events (AEs) was similar between arms, with 88.0% of NVP-treated patients and 94.8% of ATV/r-treated patients experiencing at least one AE. Nine patients (12%) in each arm experienced an AE that led to discontinuation. At week 48, a significantly greater increase was seen in mean plasma HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) in the NVP arm (9.6 mg/dl) vs. the ATV/r arm (3.5 mg/dl); p = 0.016. Also, total cholesterol (TC):HDL-C ratio on-treatment was -0.38 and -0.02 for the NVP and ATV/r arms, respectively (p = 0.038).
Efficacy results were consistent with the ARTEN study demonstrating that NVP was non-inferior to ATV/r when taken in combination with TDF/FTC. Rates of AEs were similar between the two arms, whereas HDL-C increased and TC:HDL-C decreased significantly more in patients taking NVP than ATV/r.
我们报告了来自 NEWART 的数据,这是一项随机、4 期临床试验,比较了在替诺福韦/恩曲他滨(TDF/FTC)背景下,奈韦拉平(NVP)与利托那韦增强的阿扎那韦(ATV/r)在 HIV-1 感染初治患者中的病毒学疗效和安全性。这项研究根据基于 CD4 的 NVP 起始标准(女性<250 个细胞/mm(3),男性<400 个细胞/mm(3))纳入患者,以降低发生症状性肝事件的可能性。NEWART 的设计旨在支持和证实来自 ARTEN 的研究结果,ARTEN 是一项具有类似设计和研究终点的国际试验。
共有 152 名患者按照 1:1 的比例随机分配至开放标签的 NVP 200mg 每日两次或 ATV/r(300/100mg)每日一次,加用 TDF/FTC(300/200mg)每日一次。所有患者在入组时均符合 CD4(+)指南。非劣效性的主要终点是治疗前和第 48 周的病毒学应答(确证的 HIV 血浆病毒载量<50 拷贝/ml,无反弹或改变 ARV)。整个研究期间记录了安全性数据,包括血脂。
NVP 组和 ATV/r 组分别有 46/75(61.3%)和 50/77(64.9%)的患者达到了主要终点。两组不良反应(AE)的发生率相似,NVP 治疗组和 ATV/r 治疗组分别有 88.0%和 94.8%的患者发生至少一次 AE。两组各有 9 名(12%)患者因 AE 而停药。第 48 周时,NVP 组的平均血浆高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)显著增加(9.6mg/dl),而 ATV/r 组仅增加(3.5mg/dl);p=0.016。此外,NVP 组和 ATV/r 组的治疗后总胆固醇(TC):HDL-C 比值分别为-0.38 和-0.02(p=0.038)。
疗效结果与 ARTEN 研究一致,表明 NVP 与 TDF/FTC 联合使用时与 ATV/r 相当。两组的 AE 发生率相似,而 NVP 组的 HDL-C 增加和 TC:HDL-C 降低幅度明显大于 ATV/r 组。